Laserfiche WebLink
The costs for Vi ct,on* a outlined above are for the m,odi, fied hammerhead design, as was recommend,ed 'in <br />0 1i <br />the feasibility report. We have, been working on a, reduced radius cu,l- de- sac design that shortens the <br />i <br />road as well as adds, a 25' radius cul- de- sac bu,lbi for vehicile turning movements., This would add, <br />$13,985.,50, to, the cost oflthe project, with an, associated assessment ratei for a 24 wide road, ofl$,18.ft <br />and for a 218 foot wide road S119.61/ft., <br />1-74 eb. I !—Feb 2,4 Detailed construction plans and specification prepared <br />Staff recommendatiom. Sitafflrecommeind,s that the City Council order al,l public 'improvements heard on <br />February 10, 2003-i <br />We recommend a 28 folot width on Nneview Court mainly because this is the design that was, <br />presented to the residents at the, information meeting. We have received comments from this <br />neighborhood that they would like to preserve on street parking. <br />We recommend the 28, �foolt width on W'. Victoria Frontage Road for the same rea,s�ons. While we <br />have not heard directily from the residents on this street regarding parking, we can only assume that <br />i <br />they will have same concerns as the Pi,n,eview neighborhood. The 25 foot, radius cul-de-sac bu,lb, <br />more clearly defines the public and private sections of pavement. <br />RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTIOrl <br />Adoption o f'a resolution ordering the constructi on ol f 'improvements P -ST-013 -0�2,, with recommendations on <br />the street design as outlined, above. <br />1 111 <br />