My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003_0210_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2003
>
2003_0210_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2011 11:56:57 AM
Creation date
10/24/2011 11:50:45 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
'qrom Nieprash, Ra�ndy D [rnepr h@bonestr I.+ om] <br />Thursday, J�anuary 30, 2003 8:38 AM <br />To R,osevillll e City, Comcil (E-mail) <br />Subject Larpentieur Ave., trail - questions from thle Mayor <br />Maylor & City Council members: <br />I write, to respond to the questions the Mayor asked at the meeting on Monday, 1/27/03. <br />1 . Thie Trails Commission wasi specifically inisitruictield to avoid the general city budget <br />during our deliberations and subsequent discussions, with the Council. We were charged by <br />,the Counicil. at the time with a specific and limited task. we were told that determining <br />a <br />the pr3il-oriitiles for the general budget was the plur-view of the Council and that they would <br />6 <br />not ® our straying from, our charge. We were to limit our considerations to pathways. <br />6 a a <br />If the Council is 'interesting, in gauging public opinion about the importance of <br />pathways to citizens of Roseville, i recommend that you turn to the Vista 2000 <br />prolil eict, <br />2. There are a few answers to the Mayor's question, about building a trail on the side <br />tn, 4= #- &_ <br />1-h %e-% n, t � A7cet v6v1,1%oAr.0.; d-LE-raCAJ peop" -3- - <br />P=kJP_L= k.�XIULI JL.LVt:: LCb_LUU116kj . <br />'When, Pathways are built in front of private homes, the homeowners usual <br />work very hard to see that the City takes as little of' their property as possible. Because <br />the, City Is not, eager to fight the residents on, the 'issue, the path is frequently built <br />too, close to the road, and we lend up with the endless problem described above. <br />In the case of the cemetery property, the City may ® able to more <br />ily negiotiate the conveyance of sufficient land to avoid this problem, Thus, building <br />ei a si, I <br />the path on the cemetery property may work to eiveryone's advantage, <br />3. FiLnially, I want to, respond to the Mayor's comments about the use of federal and <br />County tax money to bul"Id this trai 1. <br />The money at the federal and county levels has already been allocated. If it is not <br />01 <br />directed to this traiil project, it will be redirected to another project that has already <br />faleen deemed lesis worthy,. There will be • savings for any tax avers. <br />p � <br />0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.