Laserfiche WebLink
Subject: RE: Larpenteur Ave Sidewalk <br />--Original aid"l--- <br />FroIm�: h�h�a�upit, (mallto: h haupt@usfarnily. net,' <br />Senta. M�oin�d�a�y, Felbr�u�ary, 03i, 2�003 14-41 PM <br />To: Roseville City Counal <br />Subject: Laripente�u�r� Ave, Sil i dewa�lk, <br />ki <br />As I mentioned at the meetingI I arri in favor of the proposed sid�ewalk on the north side of Larpenteur <br />I I I <br />Avenue., As, part, ofthe Larpenteur Avenue Streetscapie projectl the sidewalk was to be included. 1 k,n�ow <br />that the cioun�ty has dropped the reiplac ace but I believe that because money Is <br />alviallable, a $40,000 investment, on the part, of'Rosevillei wou�ld be a wise decision. <br />A numbleir of residents living at Emerald R,idg,e would use the sidewalk to get to the bus lines on Dale and <br />Grotto. There Is also, one child whol attends school. Olth�er r,esi'deint's would rather use a sidewalk both <br />the winte goiing for walks or doing sm�all shopping at Tom Thumb., <br />When I was part of the Streletscape Planning� Committee for Larpente,ur, the city of St. Pla�ul flatly refuse <br />to give up any amou�nit of property on the south side of the street for wideni�ng the! street or for sidewalks. <br />1, don�'t think, they would ch�ange their minds, now. <br />Lary1ftaupt, <br />hhaupt@usfanii1y.net <br />694 Emerald Ridge <br />P%,oseville b_10 <br />5511,3-617'34i <br />USFap10v.Net - UnKmited Int,emet -� From $8.919/mo! <br />0 - - - - <br />im <br />