1993_0816_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

" I tln, City Engineer of Roseville Steve ( - February 8, 1993 Page 3 8) Where conons warrant, widthis greater, than 28 feet but less than or equal, to the 32 folot ma,x,iimuim width, shall be allowed If the following conditions are met: Parking, acceptable on both sides of the street A petition, with greater than 501% of the front footage of the property representled, indicating acceptiance of the design width ,and parking conditions., item #5 11"s, a, glood tool that, 'Indicates flexibility on the part of the City. Roadway wi,dths lessi than 24 feet but greater than or equal to 20 feet may be allowed should be substituted with all the ,other factors beilng applied, including ''Nol Parking". Widths less P i than 24 feet will be allowed only on roadways meeting the 3 "tions in, "'tem, number I cond 11 1 4....should be substituted. Add another item. to the three items listed under Policy No. 20-016 i,tem 4i. A petition, with greater than 50% of the front footage o MI the property r,epiriesente,d,, indicating acceptance of the design widt ,and parking condi" t, "Ions. I 4 11) Add, the following item to the three items listed under i Policy No. 20�-01�16, item S. Existence of waterways, wetlands, or 1i other, natural, resources that, may be impac,tied by the design width 13) Selected areas f or, parking could be established along the roadways ,if the right of' way or, other, limi,t,ations cause width and parking a %I restrictions. Thi s is often difficult to accommodate, given the different positions a, specific nelighborihoioid may present. However, 'it is one additional viable tool.