My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-10-25_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2011
>
2011-10-25_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2011 8:51:43 AM
Creation date
10/25/2011 8:47:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/25/2011
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 Step 4 - Develop /Evaluate Traffic Management Strategies <br />2 Using the data collected during the development of the traffic study and applying recognized <br />3 traffic engineering standards, the City Engineering Department will recommend the use of one <br />4 or more neighborhood traffic management strategies. A "toolbox" of strategies is included in <br />5 Section 6.0 of this plan. While it is not inclusive of all strategies, it provides a summary of the <br />6 most applied and successful measures as documented in the research summarized in Appendix <br />7 B. The toolbox includes a brief description of the strategy, its effects on volume, speed, noise, <br />8 and safety, a discussion of its advantages and disadvantages and design considerations. The <br />9 following strategies are included in the toolbox: <br />Traffic Control Devices <br />• Vehicle Restrictions <br />• Turn Restrictions <br />• One -Way Streets <br />• Watch for Children Signs <br />• Stop Sign Implementation <br />• All -Way Stop Sign Implementation <br />• Parking Restrictions <br />• Pavement Markings/ Crosswalk Striping <br />• Speed limits <br />Enforcement <br />• Increased Enforcement <br />• Variable Speed Display Board <br />Effectiveness of Strategies <br />Roadway Adjustments <br />• Narrowing Lanes <br />• Chokers <br />• Mid -Block Narrowing <br />• Chicane <br />• Sidewalks <br />Vertical Elements <br />• Speed Tables <br />• Raised Crosswalk <br />• Median Barrier <br />• Traffic Circle <br />• Street Closure <br />• Full/ Diagonal Diverter <br />• Partial Diverter <br />As stated earlier, traffic management strategies are not universally applicable or effective at <br />solving all problems. The Institute of Transportation Engineers has collected data on the <br />effectiveness of traffic management strategies implemented throughout the United States. <br />Table 2 provides a summary of this data and can be useful in the selection of appropriate traffic <br />management strategy to implement. Along with the information provided in Table 2 on <br />effectiveness, the following are some other effectiveness considerations: <br />• Traffic control devices, by themselves, are almost never effective at reducing traffic <br />volumes or vehicle speeds. <br />• Enforcement can be effective if applied regularly and over an extended period of time. <br />• In most cases, enforcement will result in local rpsodpntscitizens being ticketed. <br />• Roadway adjustments (narrowing) have proven to be moderately effective but at high <br />implementation costs. <br />• Vertical elements (primarily speed humps /bumps) have proven to be moderately <br />effective but neighborhood acceptance has been mixed. <br />• The combination of enforcement plus other strategies has proven to be the most <br />effective approach. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.