My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-10-25_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2011
>
2011-10-25_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2011 8:51:43 AM
Creation date
10/25/2011 8:47:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/25/2011
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Define Project Area / Impacted Area <br />The definition of the project area and impacted areas sn up the project boundaries and will be <br />used to determine neighborhood support during the petition process and for the assessment <br />process if a strategy is implemented. <br />Data Collection <br />Traffic data collection will include (as appropriate based on identified problem) one or more of <br />the following: <br />• Traffic volume counts (24 hour counts in 15 minute increments, truck volume counts) <br />• Non motorized transportation counts <br />Speed surveys <br />• Cut - through traffic estimates _ <br />Crash information (ikree-peersrecommended) �Ix j /2 42�°A'*1 -7 " "I "n <br />• Roadway Geometry (sight distance, lane configuration, etc.) <br />• Land Use Mix (density of residential and presence of sidewalks, pedestrian generators <br />such as schools, parks, bus routes, unique features) <br />Evaluation of Traffic Data <br />From the data collected the traffic problems associated with the neighborhood street can be <br />documented. The documentation will be valuable in the development of possible traffic <br />management strategies. <br />From the data collected the City will also be able to rank the potential projects for further study. <br />Table 1 provides the ranking criteria. This ranking will be beneficial if the number of request <br />submitted is beyond the fiscal and staffing ability of the city. By ranking requests based on the <br />criteria set forth in Table 1, the city can prioritize the projects to focus funding accordingly. <br />TABLE 1 <br />Ranking of Traffic Management Requests <br />85 Percentile speeds 5 mph over posted speed <br />Y s - +200 <br />limit wca .r.; ,i ol�" <br />o-+ <br />Public school yard, parks, playground development <br />None +0 <br />adjacent to benefited area (0 to 200 points) <br />All of 1 side +100 Gird <br />Hof 2 sides +200 <br />Residential development adjacent to benefited area <br />None +0 <br />(0 tol00 points) <br />All of 1 side +50 <br />All of 2 sides +100 <br />Number of reported correctable crashes based on <br />20 per crash; maximum of 200 poi is <br />last 5 years of available data (0 to 200 points) <br />(�//r�/ j / r ry yc a. i <br />Pathway adjacent to project area (0 to 100 points) <br />None +10a <br />All of 1 side +50 <br />All of 2 sides +Q <br />Percent of potential assessment properties <br />3 points per percent; maximum 300 points <br />supporting project by petition (180 to 300 points) <br />Average residential density adjacent to project area <br />0 dwelling units per 100 lin. ft. = 0 points <br />(0 to50 points) <br />5+ dwellings units per adjacent 100 lin. ft. =.50 <br />points <br />3 oR YY11r <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.