My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-10-25_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2011
>
2011-10-25_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2011 8:51:43 AM
Creation date
10/25/2011 8:47:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/25/2011
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M zco h <br />Traffic Management Policv <br />Steve Gjerdingen Comments: <br />Page 1— 1.0 <br />• Paragraph 1: We need to reference the comment about traffic volumes increasing in Roseville. I <br />heard comments about America's vehicle mileage being down for once in many years. We need <br />severity defined. Paragraph 1: <br />• Paragraph 1: "The City of Roseville is continually striving to strengthen and protect its NO 44Ak *1 <br />neighborhoods by improving the quality of life in residential areas, but notat4Ha.Gc6iaf <br />detaraemtMg-trusiness, institutional, park land, and other areas of the city." <br />Paragraph 2: "Allows the city to better respond to residents and businesses" <br />Paragraph 3: "Therefore, for citizens to obtain" <br />Page 1 -1.1 <br />•'Traffic management strategies on local streets" — eliminate word residents <br />• Excessive volumes and vehicle speeds, unwanted aggressive road behavior, conflicts between <br />motorized and non - motorized users Fvgf m >ISCwSS I dtA <br />Page 1— 2.0 <br />v" Implementation limited to local streets (no arterials). I want a definition of "collectors" before I <br />agree to use it here. Don't refer to the Roseville Transportation Plan. Put it in the document. i <br />don't have time to read the plan and neither will people reading this policy. At the very least, <br />put in a brief summary. 'P'LPtN yJ 1 LL. pF 1N AIFPP£ND IX <br />• Add the following policy: The program intends to address longstanding issues. The program is <br />not intended to be used as a tool to address issues before they occur. A longstanding issue is an <br />issue that can reasonably argued to have been a problem for at least three months. <br />Ex: Fairview Fields parking concerns along Skillman and Prior. Hiatus on neighborhood request <br />to give it a 1 season trial first under the new configuration before modifying street <br />characteristics. NO Cw4p4(s <br />Page 2 <br />• Top sentence "and will help address the issue of displacement /diversion to other streets" <br />eliminate the word local. It's a problem if traffic gets diverted anywhere if the street it's <br />diverted to is already at capacity (ex: Fairview ave between Lydia and Cty D) or could cause <br />other issues on the neighboring street (safety issues) <br />V11_�Section 3.0, paragraph 4 "classified as local streets " — eliminate residential. <br />Section 3.0, paragraph 4 "eliminate any mentioning of collectors. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.