Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />DATE: June 16 ji <br />TO Steve Sarkozy <br />FROM. R illc,k Jopke <br />i Z 601 W <br />Gi <br />al <br />SUBJECTO Comments Concerning the List of Issues and Questions <br />raised by f n I ng Commission Concerning the <br />Roseville Lutheiran Church Proposal <br />Item I The intent olf this comment <br />consider <br />park needs of' all age and, economic groups and to th <br />extent Possible, the C"ty should evaluate the ultimate Pa,.r <br />facilities which, <br />demographic those, <br />l <br />an that, be evaluate should overall, <br />I by 2 <br />and, + i commission <br />master, <br />Item 31 4"1 Yes,, this is true this is, an area that the City, throug <br />the comprehensive, planning. <br />conclusions * how these various - balanced "in th <br />communitys <br />Item 6 - There is an acknowledged <br />Highway 36 which 'the City, needs, to evaluate on an overall basis <br />Tio thile extient that the proposal improves, the situation, it shoula <br />be considered. <br />Item 7, f <br />and it Churches are e generally p o _ aspect <br />c7teighborhoods but so are parks and the users of parks also ca <br />Item distance i seems to be a function <br />41 <br />of <br />_I r types, of facilities being provided. Depending <br />RI <br />what those facilities are and whol typiically uses them, the <br />II or may not • _ o <br />Item, 11 The comprehensive plan Is a planning document which <br />should bell continually i <br />diesiLres, of the commun'ty changes. Wh3L1e the neighborhood may be <br />relying on the park deli si gnat ion, the City Council is clearly free <br />