Laserfiche WebLink
to evaluate those designations fromtime. to timee <br />Ctem 12 No commentm <br />- - .. # • - i <br />II <br />II <br />"' community o e a I <br />1 i - to all sides of <br />the, 'issue d again II <br />the ov,erlia o I n IN I I IN <br />Item 1 - See Item #2 * <br />These items that, Should be • _ 17 and 1,9 Item, r should, not but dr,ive - # � • • ` based <br />I <br />on what, i,si the best overall need for, the community as a whole and <br />o necessarily <br />what iis best for the chu,riche <br />Item, • * This Comment .• <br />person in the community and as previously 3"Lndl"cated, the users of <br />the park, f + I In T relevant. <br />1 <br />be r based <br />Item <br />Item 24f 2,81t 310jt 32 and, 33 - Relate to what options has the <br />church explored o reduce - amount of park . d . would • a <br />needed,. I don't have a, good feel, for what their ultimate needs <br />are to _ able to w <br />comment <br />if <br />t a _ <br />I I, and 31 - See Item #2e <br />~ II s • relevancy s <br />51 16 it 6 f iede <br />stiati,stici would ® II , <br />ii have to be veri <br />Item 34 - See Item <br />