My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1993_0621_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1993
>
1993_0621_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2011 3:12:16 PM
Creation date
10/25/2011 3:07:39 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In <br />jD 4N iLize-UNGTONPROPERTY a. Continud <br />6* It has been sugoested by Roseville Lutheran C'hiurch that one large park, "s less expensI@v <br />to mam"Wn than 2, small parksM We do not, belloeve that any potential (land at this POI <br />0 <br />hypothetical) sayings to the City -due, to concentration of'Parks will be elither signifi <br />or will be offset by the, loss of Bruce Russell Park.1 <br />A, spokesperson for commented that, people who play baseball and tennis oft= <br />4' <br />expect to drive to fields and courts. While this i's true,, 141t'is just, as true that the m�ore <br />facnities, their are in close prox Moi ood, the ho'gher the quality of life. <br />1, ity to your neighborh <br />Forcing moire people to drive further is not a benefit'. <br />"O,N'CE A PARKi ALWAYS A PARK" <br />1 N*$ II . - At <br />If t <br />According to a, spokesperson, for RLC, 45%1 of RLC members are, not Roseville <br />resicents.1 We would object to the, loss of 'Bruce Russell Park even if all, of the <br />congregation were, Roseville residents, but it i*s especially disturbing to lose the Park if <br />a substantial fraction of' the congrevlation are noti-residents. <br />C; <br />4 SAVE BRUCE RUSSELL PARX <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.