Laserfiche WebLink
*I <br />Cl. ROSEVILLE LUTHERAN CHURCH (RLC) a. Continued <br />0 0 <br />2. It is, unclear how Roseville can ble sure that RLC can fol,low through on their promises. <br />To what extenit "is the implementation of RLiC's plan, dependent upon, the supporli of their <br />61 ull implementation depend <br />congregation? Doeis that support ex,isit? To what, extent does, f <br />0, <br />upon the aWlity of RLC to radse funds.) What contingency opti'lons does Roseville have <br />to proiteict itself from any possible failure on, the part of RL,C' to meet its promises. <br />A spokesperson for RLC menifioned that, in adverfisng holmes for sale,, *Close to <br />Church" is, a selling point.1 u I is at least as im p ortant to state, *Cl ose, <br />is may be so, bt, 't * <br />to Park". In addition, the park 'is, non-denominational, and serves, all ofthe, community, <br />while RLC serves a Lutheran congregation. <br />50 R i d osed, a plan which benefits the Church, at, the expense ofthe neighborhood <br />9 <br />r Wents. When faicing si'milar increases in COngTevadon size, North Heicrhts Lutheran <br />esi <br />adopit this option instead. <br />split. their congregadon, into, two churches., We propose the RLC <br />*1 <br />of depniving the neighborhood of'Bruce Russell Park. <br />5 SAVE BRUCE RUSSELL PARK <br />