My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2011_1010
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2011
>
CC_Minutes_2011_1010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2011 9:55:35 AM
Creation date
10/26/2011 9:55:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/10/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, October 10, 2011 <br /> Page 22 <br /> • opined that he, among others, had participated in considerable discussion at the <br /> Comprehensive Plan Update Steering Committee level when studying traffic is- <br /> sues. Councilmember Johnson advised that one recurring issue that came up was <br /> to create east/west thoroughfares and pathways that were sustainable, and while <br /> perhaps not being obvious in the budget, remained a hot topic and part of on <br /> going considerations and discussions. <br /> Mayor Roe concurred, noting that both the Comprehensive Plan's land use and <br /> transportation chapters dealt with these issues for east/west connectivity and rami- <br /> fications and impacts of those connections. As part of the County Road B discus- <br /> sions, considerable consideration was given to how best to address impacts of <br /> those policy recommendations in the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> Councilmember McGehee thanked Ms. Patricia Rantenen for referencing the Edi- <br /> na study, and agreed that the City could do a better job; and remained, before and <br /> after her service on the City Council, a strong supporter of keeping through traffic <br /> out of neighborhoods. <br /> Councilmember Johnson asked that Ms. Patricia Rantenen provide the City Coun- <br /> cil with information on the link for the Edina Traffic Management Plan that she <br /> had referenced. <br /> • Discussion ensued on the next step following tonight's discussion and additional <br /> information provided by staff; including the preference to make a decision sooner <br /> rather than later; challenges for providing notice for the decision at the October <br /> 17, 2011 meeting as discussed; and preference for moving forward with a deci- <br /> sion. <br /> Ms. Bloom advised that she was only aware of two (2) remaining questions and <br /> information requests of staff: ongoing electrical and other related costs for traffic <br /> signals; and cost comparisons for concrete versus bituminous pathways. <br /> By consensus, staff was directed to include this as an "Action" item for the Octo- <br /> ber 17, 2011 regular City Council meeting; and to provide applicable notice con- <br /> sistent with past practice, while recognizing that the notice period was limited, <br /> and asking that residents and neighborhood spokespeople help spread the word. <br /> Recess <br /> Mayor Roe recessed the meeting at approximately 8:21 p.m. and reconvened at approximately <br /> 8:30 p.m. <br /> 11. Public Hearings <br /> 12. Business Items (Action Items) <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.