Laserfiche WebLink
a <br />units on the site any, further for economic reasons. The <br />a <br />condi ons recommended by the Planni,nci Commiss ion would require <br />4W <br />-t-hei reduction "in the number of dweil 1 ing units on the sio te,. <br />41 <br />Alternatives <br />Deny approval of the proposed rezoning based on the finding <br />01 <br />that the proposal would be detrimental to the general health, <br />Of A% 9 <br />public safety, and, welfare. Speciric findings of fact should <br />be outl ined, to support, this, decision. <br />C-1 <br />201 Approve the proj ect w ith approâ–º r iate cond itions based on th- <br />finding, that'the proposal would be consistent with the City' <br />comprehensive, plan and, would not be detrimental to the genera <br />heialth,, public saf'eitiyi and wel,farie., <br />!tus I =10EX <br />on, <br />the, fact that <br />the developers have <br />stated that they <br />.,Based <br />would not, <br />91 <br />be will,ing to, <br />reduce the, density on <br />the s ite in order <br />to meet <br />11 <br />the Planning <br />1 IV <br />commission's special <br />conditions, the <br />Heritage <br />Development of' Minnesota Inc. request for rezoning <br />froNN, R-1 <br />to PUD at 725 <br />W. Larpenteur Avenue <br />should be denied, <br />1!111 14MV <br />III <br />motion to deny Heritage, Development of Minnesota Inc. request <br />for riezon,in,g, from R-1 'to PUD at, 725 W. Larpenteur Avenue. This <br />if 4 <br />iteIN should be continued until the City Attorney drafts ®. <br />@1 0 41 <br />appropriate finding's f I or the denial in resolution forms <br />