Z4
<br />Paul 1-94 East
<br />1 is corridor from downtown, St. Paul to the
<br />An NOV la,ne conversion should be *lmplemen,t,cd 'n th,
<br />WO a 0i a Bi
<br />isconsin border. Th* to be done in conjunction wit
<br />is conversion is, M the reconstruction of the
<br />fre.eway between McKnight Road, and TH 120 to provide three continuous lanes in each direction,
<br />o would become an HOVIanep
<br />Special HOV access should be provided, to the greatest extent possible, at the two major traffic
<br />* I IN 41
<br />generators, I I n the com I aon: downtown St., Paul and the 3M Center.
<br />11111111 11=
<br />1131MITI-T7.10, P I Ili I 1 6. 0
<br />*An HOV lane conveirsloWa d t uld be, mplemented this corridor from downt
<br />I I d i ion s,ho I in 01
<br />Minneapolis to, Rogers. Tbis 'improvement should, be, carried out in three stages:
<br />a
<br />The firsit stage, should include the variousi 1992 Team Transit projects described in the
<br />0,
<br />Low-Capital Improvements, section, shoul,dier bus lanes at the 3rd/4th Streets
<br />r
<br />mmps and on T.,H'., 252, north of i-694/1-94 interchange and other minor turning-
<br />c-novement improvements). 61
<br />The second stage should include an HOV lane conversion between downtown
<br />Minneapolis and the 1-694i "interchange,, provided that Mn/DOT resiolves the
<br />operational o'sues, identified in Chapter, 4.
<br />The third stage should *include the winversion/addition, of HOV lanes from, the 1-694
<br />0
<br />interchange to Rogers, provided, that successful finplementation of the first two stages
<br />I
<br />Justifies this third phase as a, cost-effectiVe investment.
<br />1494 (from 34th Avenue to Je394)
<br />An HOV lane addition ffied Mi the d,riaift EIS process currently under way, should be
<br />as descn
<br />implemented in this, corridor. Right-of-way should be reserved, in, the median for future, capacity
<br />0
<br />expansion, if needed.
<br />I
<br />, Central CorAdori (from downtown, MinneepDlis tDidowntiown Sit. Paul)
<br />A Liaht Rail Transit (LBM line, on a surface alignment, should be implemented in thn* com*dor.
<br />Issues regarding t 9, fundffig and governance are, discussed in Chapter 6*
<br />i &11 U V 1=1
<br />I q V 0
<br />Tbe LRT-Wus-Lam -Conversion alternative descr'
<br />0 lima in the Draft EIS process under way should be
<br />implemented, i this, comidor. Implementation asues ti discussed M' Chapter
<br />TeHo 36
<br />Over the next five Years, Mn/DOT should evialuaLe thei future -caivacitv needs in tni i si com I dor. If' new
<br />lanes are to be added, these, should be HOVlanesy
<br />Me
<br />
|