Laserfiche WebLink
y, <br />DATE: 2/24/92 <br />ITEM NO <br />D a 111 <br />epartment Approval. # Agenda <br />+► Reports and Recommendatil ons <br />z2i <br />Item D '" I rl I + <br />Acceptance of Bids for Central Park Victoria Lights <br />The approved 1992 PIP includes, the lighting of two softball fields in <br />_ Central Park Athletic Complex,, _ electrical engineer- <br />ing <br />al 9 <br />flucatil"ons. Following review, by the, City Attorney's office the pro3ect <br />was sent out for bled eived: <br />1 1. and the following, bids were rec ' <br />Vendor <br />Ba,sie <br />Alternate 1 <br />Alternate 2 <br />Alternate 3 <br /># <br />(deduct) <br />Egan-McKay <br />$64F199 <br />$-51,,510O <br />$5j,100 <br />$5,F600 <br />Collins <br />714,F5OO <br />-6or500 <br />51800 <br />4,F 100 <br />Metro El,ec Co st <br />n-4,, <br />88j,4100 <br />i <br />5,F412 <br />6,680 <br />,Arca,de Electric <br />914i ji 000 <br />-61,r 000 <br />5j,327 <br />6.v070 <br />I <br />41 le <br />#1, Using some existing poles from f ield currently 110 ghted <br />#2 Using an upgraded fixture that reduces glare and spillage <br />#31 Laying wire for the future, lighting of an aaaitional f iell <br />0 <br />,After receiving the bids, Egane-McKiay requested the withdrawal of the ir <br />bid, because of a calculation error by their estimator. Staff request- <br />documentatIon olf tihell error which was reviewed and on advice of the <br />City Attorney, we recommend approvingi their bid <br />Residents of the project area expressed some concerns over the addi- <br />tional lightil"ng., Meetings with the residents have resulted in the <br />!► _ 111 '► <br />L. Field one will be lit 'instead of' f <br />2,n No other f'iel,dis at thi a, site will, be lit until the af f ects of <br />the additional lighting are evaluated and reviewed with neigh- <br />3. Landscaping 71 'parking lot improviements reviewed <br />mi <br />neighbors when spleicificati,on,s are ready. <br />