|
0 0
<br />The,, projection, for 19,912 is based on the trends of the past years, plus
<br />a
<br />the fact that the recycling bins shoiu,l,d, encourage a significant number
<br />of nliew, recyclers,9
<br />The
<br />• Jli at its Nmber 12 met' will bstalish
<br />Cunici, ove e e e b
<br />1 Ing the
<br />riecyclionig fee wihich will appear on, residents' utility bills. The f ee
<br />wIL11, be based on, the, cost of the curbside collection, administration
<br />%, IN
<br />cost, and the cost of' promoting recyciLi,ng wn the City.
<br />in order to establish, a fee with some degree of certainty, the base bid
<br />cialled, for a pier household cost rather than a per ton cost. The 1 ow
<br />I I s from Super Cycle $in the amount of $1.85/household, or
<br />$17,945 pier month.. The other base bid friom Waste Management was $2.30/
<br />household or $221,,310 per, month and, wou,l,d 'include weekly collection.
<br />r I I iiiina
<br />Super Cycle also bid an alternate of $1,.98 per household, and Rosevij-i-e
<br />would receive one-third of the revenues from the sale of mater'als.
<br />Assuming an average of 240 tons per month and current market prices for
<br />materials, the cost to the city per month would be
<br />$5,00 less pier mointh than the $1.85 per household bid with no sharing of
<br />revenue .
<br />There "i's the risk, o,f course, that pri"Lices for materials could decrease,
<br />but there is also the potential for 'increased prices. In addition, the
<br />sharing olf revienues would give the city incentive to increaso, the amount
<br />of r,ie,cy,clables colleictield.
<br />a
<br />Recommendation,
<br />It isi recommended the bid be awarded to Super Cycle in the amount o
<br />6 1 1
<br />$1,,.98 Pier household with, the City of' Roseville receiving one-third o
<br />the rievenue from the sale of recyclables, collected. The materials to b
<br />collected include all current items plus cereal boxes, I
<br />Siupe,r Cycle hasi provided, excellent rielcycling services to the residents
<br />of
<br />®. community for the past four and one-half years. They have been
<br />very willing to work with the City 'in providing additional data for end
<br />of month reports and in supporting special pickups during the past two
<br />yearsi .
<br />II
<br />!11111�' 1`111 115i)i! 111
<br />motion awarding the bid for curbside collectaLon of recyclables to Super
<br />Cycle "in the amount of $,1.9,8/housiehold pier month for 9,700 households,
<br />w "th the City of Rosieville to recedive, on
<br />i, e-third of the revenues from the
<br />V
<br />sale of all mat,er,i,al,s �collected. The materials collected include all(
<br />current items plus cereal boxes.
<br />Av erage
<br />Percentage/'Increase
<br />Monthly
<br />Over Previous
<br />Year
<br />Tonnage
<br />Year.
<br />1987
<br />54
<br />1988
<br />79
<br />46%
<br />1989
<br />99
<br />25%
<br />19 91 01
<br />1,35,
<br />36%
<br />19911 (through October)
<br />177
<br />31%
<br />1919i,2 (piroj ectied)
<br />239
<br />35%
<br />0 0
<br />The,, projection, for 19,912 is based on the trends of the past years, plus
<br />a
<br />the fact that the recycling bins shoiu,l,d, encourage a significant number
<br />of nliew, recyclers,9
<br />The
<br />• Jli at its Nmber 12 met' will bstalish
<br />Cunici, ove e e e b
<br />1 Ing the
<br />riecyclionig fee wihich will appear on, residents' utility bills. The f ee
<br />wIL11, be based on, the, cost of the curbside collection, administration
<br />%, IN
<br />cost, and the cost of' promoting recyciLi,ng wn the City.
<br />in order to establish, a fee with some degree of certainty, the base bid
<br />cialled, for a pier household cost rather than a per ton cost. The 1 ow
<br />I I s from Super Cycle $in the amount of $1.85/household, or
<br />$17,945 pier month.. The other base bid friom Waste Management was $2.30/
<br />household or $221,,310 per, month and, wou,l,d 'include weekly collection.
<br />r I I iiiina
<br />Super Cycle also bid an alternate of $1,.98 per household, and Rosevij-i-e
<br />would receive one-third of the revenues from the sale of mater'als.
<br />Assuming an average of 240 tons per month and current market prices for
<br />materials, the cost to the city per month would be
<br />$5,00 less pier mointh than the $1.85 per household bid with no sharing of
<br />revenue .
<br />There "i's the risk, o,f course, that pri"Lices for materials could decrease,
<br />but there is also the potential for 'increased prices. In addition, the
<br />sharing olf revienues would give the city incentive to increaso, the amount
<br />of r,ie,cy,clables colleictield.
<br />a
<br />Recommendation,
<br />It isi recommended the bid be awarded to Super Cycle in the amount o
<br />6 1 1
<br />$1,,.98 Pier household with, the City of' Roseville receiving one-third o
<br />the rievenue from the sale of recyclables, collected. The materials to b
<br />collected include all current items plus cereal boxes, I
<br />Siupe,r Cycle hasi provided, excellent rielcycling services to the residents
<br />of
<br />®. community for the past four and one-half years. They have been
<br />very willing to work with the City 'in providing additional data for end
<br />of month reports and in supporting special pickups during the past two
<br />yearsi .
<br />II
<br />!11111�' 1`111 115i)i! 111
<br />motion awarding the bid for curbside collectaLon of recyclables to Super
<br />Cycle "in the amount of $,1.9,8/housiehold pier month for 9,700 households,
<br />w "th the City of Rosieville to recedive, on
<br />i, e-third of the revenues from the
<br />V
<br />sale of all mat,er,i,al,s �collected. The materials collected include all(
<br />current items plus cereal boxes.
<br />
|