|
§1 *3[l] ZONING 61- 14
<br />70 For disicussion and compilation of variance cases, see 3 Rathkopf, The Law of
<br />Zoning and Planning, ch. 38 (4th eld. 19185) .
<br />ja per, Inc., v. Municipal Counclil, 569 A,. 2d 304 (N.J. App. 1990) (use
<br />varilance should be granted for congregate care senior citizen housing since it
<br />advanced the public welfare and did not have an adverse trarric or intensity impact on
<br />the surround ,ing, community).
<br />71 Area.- Association for Preservation of 17100 Block of'N St. v. Board of Zoning
<br />Adjustment, 3814 A.2d 674 (D. C. App. 1978)1; Use: Murphy v. Kraemer', 16 Misc. 2d
<br />37141 1812 N.Y.S.2d 2,05 (1958).
<br />72 Area: Piardfield, Rioad, Co. v. Bronxville, 1, N-Y-2d 841, 1,53 N'.Y.S,.,2,d, 221., 135
<br />N' .E.2d 72,5 (11915161); Use: Ennis v. Crowley, 12 App. Div., 2,d 9919, 211 N.Y.S.2d 500
<br />(1961).
<br />73 E. g.,, Township, of W. Dieer, v,. Bowman, 17 Pa., Commw. 579, 3,3,31 A.2d 792
<br />1
<br />(11975).
<br />74 Strange v., Board of Zoning Appeals, 42,81 N.E.2d, 1328 (Ind. App. 1981);
<br />Craziano, v. Board of Adjustment". 312,31 N.W.2d 233 (Iowa 19812)1.
<br />7'5 D., Hagman., Urban ',Planning and Land Development Control Law 1196-206
<br />
|