Laserfiche WebLink
A <br />LAWF GAMBLG <br />58 INIV <br />Downs. Another was the previously dlscussed case of' the origanization that <br />was playing itself for not charging rent at retirement parties. The other two <br />11 0 <br />cases were minor misstatements of what the funds went for. <br />ljj� <br />PIP I W=10T, + 3111MA 1761W� I" <br />*1 1-- <br />Although there is a, potential risk for, clontributions to be fraudulenfly <br />made to non -existent organizations, or used i*n ways they were not <br />intended,, that is not occurring on a large scale. <br />As a result,, we Wileve that proposed plans to register recipients of lawful pur- <br />*blut" <br />pose contri ions are unnecessary and would nolt be cost-effective. <br />Plrobl,ems With Proof t Caru,foinva,rd <br />Reviews of tax We reviewed 100 organizations' tax returins to, deterim,i,n,e if the gambling bank <br />reltur'ns showed account, plus the ending inventory and minus, the unpaid liabilities, approxi- <br />33 Only an approximation is possible because of a mumbler of'tuning differences in accounting for gam- <br />bling proceeds. ALso, the total organization, cash bank is not reported. However, these differences are usu- <br />ally no moire than a few thousand dollars one way or the other,., <br />34 ne Department of Revenue plans to begin entering these nuimbers soon. <br />