2011_0110_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

The anticipated next steps are for the Parks end Recreation Commission end the COT to: 36 • Explore project phasing options 37 0 Guide the statistically valid survey in order to com�pare end con�trast the fin�al plan 38 details an�d determ�in�e support level for implementation direction 39 0 Com�m�un�icate plans details and implementation strategies to com�m�un�ity 40 0 Review, an�alyze any recommen�d consideration of fun�din�g mech�an�isms, not °11 along e, but in�cludin�g a referendum for phase 1 for fall 2011 42 43 Two items before us at this paint and outlined below are to identify an implementation process 44 budget for the COT and to proceed with the statistically valid survey., 45 46 Overall Implementation Bud 47 It is im portan�t that the process and the Citizen Organ�izin�g Team (COT') h�ave resources to do 4,', their work and com�m�un�ity outreach�., T'h�e COT discussed and recom�m�e nod ed a budget of 49 $,50,000 which is in�cluded in your packet., The entire budget is for community outreach and involvement. 53 On January 4, th 1 2010, the Parks and Recreation Commission discussed the process budget 54 and recom�m�en�ds to you that $,50,000 be allocated to th�e citizen implementation effort for th�e items listed ins the attached budget. Although h�esitan�t to take from the already dim�in�ish�ed Park Improvement Program (PIP) budget, but with n�o other alternatives, the Commission recom�m�en�ds that it be taken from the following sources-, 1) $,4,0,000 from the adopted $,18,5,000 Park Improvement Program (PIP) budget and 2) $,10,000 from the City 9 Com�m�un�ication�s budget approved by the City Manager. 60 6 1 Surve 62 This is an item that has been discussed for some time and was recommended by the Master 63 Plan Citizen Advisory Team (CAT). The COT has met twice since the adoption of the final 64 plan with the next mooting scheduled for January 11 t"1 2011. T'h�ey are anxious to proceed 6°` with the statistically valid survey to be able to continue their work in earnest 66 67 Several qualified market research firms were contacted to submit a proposal. Two proposals 68 were received from National firms that specialize in the type of information that the COT', 69 Commission and staff are seeking. T'h�e two proposals received were from Green '7 0 Play/Nation�al Research Center and Leisure Vision. '7 1 '72 Parks and Recreation Commission Chair and COT'm�em�ber Stark was asked by the COT to '7 3 work with staff to lead the survey effort and has agreed., 74 '75 After proposal review and analysis by Stark, members of the COT and the Parks and 76 Recreation Commission, Leisure Vision is being recommended (proposal attached) to conduct '7 "7 the survey., '7 8 '7 9 On January 4, th ) 2010 the Parks and Recreation reviewed both survey proposals and recommend that the City Council authorize the attached Leisure Vision proposal Page 2 of 4