Laserfiche WebLink
P A <br />6=01 a JOK01 N61 A VfkWM W!�J <br />I r I <br />Rating <br />City ofFort Worth - 2003 <br />BAR and RECREATION <br />Most <br />most <br />Importance- <br />2003 I-S <br />Iiiii,ol-ti,111 111,I )ol,talit <br />satistactioil <br />satisfi-Ictioll <br />satisfaction <br />Rating <br />Category of Service <br />Rank <br />% <br />Rank <br />Rating <br />Rani <br />High Prikift, (IS . 10% M <br />Outdoor Swimming polols <br />20% <br />5 <br />27% <br />14 <br />0. 460 <br />1 <br />Number of walki ng/bi ki n tral Is <br />24% <br />2 <br />49% <br />9 <br />0.1224 <br />2 <br />Quality of Facilities at City Parks <br />24% <br />2 <br />54% <br />4 <br />0.1104 <br />3 <br />The City's youth athletic programs <br />19% <br />6 <br />45% <br />10 <br />0.1045 <br />4 <br />Medhim PrioLjW (IS <. 10) <br />Indoor Swimming Pools <br />13% <br />9 <br />25% <br />15 <br />0.0975 <br />5 <br />Maintenance of City parks <br />27% <br />1 <br />67% <br />2 <br />0.0891 <br />6 <br />Summer Recreation Programs <br />14% <br />8 <br />44% <br />11 <br />0.0784 <br />7' <br />The number of City parks <br />17% <br />7 <br />54% <br />4 <br />0.0782 <br />8 <br />Maintenance of Community Centers <br />11% <br />10 <br />56% <br />3 <br />0.0484 <br />9 <br />City Ii birari es <br />21% <br />4 <br />79% <br />1 <br />0.0441 <br />10 <br />The City's adult athletic programs <br />7% <br />13 <br />39% <br />13 <br />0.0427 <br />11 <br />,Availabillity of Meeting'space <br />8% <br />11 <br />51% <br />8 <br />0.0392 <br />12 <br />,Outdoor athletic fields <br />8% <br />11 <br />52% <br />6 <br />0.0384 <br />13 <br />Lase of registering for programs <br />5% <br />14 <br />42% <br />12 <br />0.0290 <br />14 <br />City Golf Courses <br />5% <br />14 <br />52% <br />6 <br />0.0240 <br />15 <br />Phase III: Deliverables <br />■ 15 copies of draft report, including executive summary, charts, and graphs <br />■ 15 copies of final report, including executive summary, charts, and graphs <br />■ Powerpoint presentation of survey findings <br />■ Survey database in electronic format <br />■ National benchmarking comparisons (optional), <br />■ Methodology regarding a demand/supply model (optional), <br />■ Comparisons of numbers of parks, trails and facilities per 1,000 residents (optional) <br />■ Importance /satisfaction matrix (optional) <br />NOTE: Optional services will not add any dates to the project. <br />Leisure Vision Project Approach 15 <br />