My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011_0124_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2011
>
2011_0124_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2011 4:19:58 PM
Creation date
11/8/2011 3:09:04 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
245
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
`3 6 Commission and staff are seeking., The two proposals received were from Green <br />37 FBI ay/Nations al Research Center and Leisure Vision. <br />38 <br />39 On January 4, t h 1 2011 the Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed both survey proposals <br />44:,) and unanimously recommend that the City Council auth�orize the attached Leisure Vision <br />4 1 proposal., <br />42 <br />43 After review and analysis of the proposal by Stark, members of the COT 'as well as the Parks <br />44 and Recreation Commission, Leisure Vision is being recommended to conduct the survey., <br />45 <br />46 The tim�efram�e of the survey is outlined in the proposal and is an approxim�ate three month <br />47 process., It will be coordinated with the recently approved City satisfaction survey to avoid <br />48 duplications of recipients., <br />49 <br />5o Questions for the survey are yet to be established and will be reviewed and guided by the <br />� Parks and Recreation Commission and the Citizen Organ�izin�g Team (COT). <br />53 On January 1 t"1 2011 the City Council approved a $,50,000 budget for the implementation <br />4 phase, which included the statistically valid survey., Authorization of the survey was tabled <br />until tonight's m�eetin�g. <br />Three survey options were provided from Leisure Vision and it is recom�m n�ded that the 600 <br />58 sam�ple survey be chiosen�, plus the ben�ch�m�arkin�g option as outline d ins the proposal., T'h�e total <br />9 cost is $,21,100., It will be paid for by the master plan implementation budget that was <br />6o approved at your January 10, 2011 m�eetin�g., <br />62 PC LACY OBJECTIVE <br />63 The process is consistent with City goals to engage the commun�ity when plan�n�in�g the provision of <br />64 services, facilities and land use. It is also consistent with the City's efforts outline d ins I 2025., <br />65 <br />66 FINANCIAL IMIPACTS <br />67 The total cost of the survey, including the ben�ch�m rkin�g option is $,21,100 and is proposed to be <br />64, paid for with the $,50,000 implementation phase budget approved on January 1 ot") 24 11 <br />69 <br />7('-) STAFF, RECOMMENDATION <br />7 1 Based upon th�e recommendation of th�e Parks and Recreation Commission and th�e Citizen <br />"72 Organ�izin�g T'eam�, staff recom�m�enods that the City Council authorize the atta Chi ed Leisure Vision <br />"73 proposal to conduct a statistically valid survey including the ben�ch�m�ark options for a cost of $,211100 <br />"74 paid for with the approved implementation phase budget., <br />"7 <br />76 REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION <br />77 Motion to authorize the attached proposal from Leisure Vision to conduct a statistically valid survey <br />"7 including the ben�ch�m rk option for a cost of $,21,100 paid for with the $,50,000 Master Plan <br />"7 9 Implementation Budget that was approved on January 1 oth 12011., <br />Prepared by-, (Lennie Brokke, Director of Parks and Recreation <br />I " <br />Attachment: <br />a., Master Plan Implementation Process Budget <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.