1990_0822_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

City of Evaluation of Chief Executive Executive Off icer Explanati"ons and Directions Performance Evaluation as Team Building Evaluation as Team, Building, Ifevaluation , is to be, in the truest sense, a means of team building, certain conditions must Prevail. The two processes must be compatible and interrelated in the following ways: 1. Evaluation is basically a, means, not an end in itself. 41 2* The truest level between the evaluatee and evaluators' must be high. 31. The roles each are to fulfill m,u�st be clearly indicated and accepted. 4. Riesponsil bilit lies, are matched with pre-determined standards of performance., 41 Definition of Roles A. City Council, 1. Conduct" annual assessments of performance of the Chief Executive Officer (CEO). 2. respect the prerogatives of the CEO *insofar as operational management function - of the organization is concerned, and the policy function of the Council. 3. Make assessments in eeral terms except in 'Instances where specific improvements are needed, or when explicit commendations are due. B. Chief Executi,ve officer L Accepts the prospects of annual evaluations. 2. Understands the scope and thrust of the evaluations. I Expects the evaluations to adhere to, the established procedures for evaluating the performance of the CEO., -;;rxio liq III 1 1 � I V 7r, ;Iii� I IIIII!II!1I - 41 A performance �standard is defined as the condition. that will exist when a responsibility or function, is successfully performed. It is essential that a performance standard be established, at the outset, for each of the eight major areas, of responsibility of the CEO. This is necessary in order, to use the rating scale effectively. 111111i i lop ., It should be riefterated, that in determining the appropriate, level of expectations, actual performance must be measured in rela,t,ion, to the lindicated, standard, of performance. Eight, major areas of' responsibility are identified as the basis upon which assessments are to 1, be made., Descriptors, are provided under each to clarify the meaning and content of the area. However, the evaluation is made of the major area.