Laserfiche WebLink
5 "7 <br />58 <br />59 <br />83 <br />Citywide Expenditure Comparison <br />The following table depicts the 2008 expenditures for the fiscal period ending March 31, 2008 <br />(unaudited) for the City's core programs and services. <br />Expenditures <br />General government <br />Public safety <br />Public works <br />Information technology <br />Communications <br />Recreation <br />Community development <br />License Center <br />Sanitary Sewer <br />Water <br />Storm Drainage <br />Golf Course <br />Recycling <br />Total Expenditures <br />2007 2007 % % <br />uB Actual Actual Norm. Diff. <br />1.1759.1695 3 <br />315.1660 1 <br />17.9% 1 <br />19.4% - <br />-1.4% <br />7.1514.1680 1 <br />1.1704.17 67 2 <br />22.7% 2 <br />24.7% - <br />-2.1% <br />2.1427.1875 5 <br />563.1116 2 <br />23.2% 2 <br />22.4% 0 <br />0.8% <br />822.1100 1 <br />173.1156 2 <br />21.1% 3 <br />33.5% - <br />-12.5% <br />320.1550 1 <br />129.1700 4 <br />40.5% 4 <br />45.9% - <br />-5.4% <br />3.1573.1745 6 <br />660.1170 1 <br />18.5% 1 <br />19.9% - <br />-1.4% <br />1.1302.1245 2 <br />284.1892 2 <br />21.9% 2 <br />20.4% 1 <br />1.4% <br />I,20 ,27 2 <br />213.1480 1 <br />17.7% 1 <br />19.9% - <br />-2.2% <br />3.1909.1450 7 <br />737.1971 1 <br />18.9% 1 <br />19.9% - <br />-1.0% <br />I7 .180 3 <br />362.1810 7 <br />7.0% 1 <br />11.3% - <br />-4.2% <br />1.1326.1675 5 <br />51.1197 3 <br />3.9% 1 <br />14.2% - <br />-10.3% <br />410.1100 3 <br />38.1284 9 <br />9.3% 1 <br />13.4% - <br />-4.0% <br />384.1750 1 <br />110.1173 2 <br />28.6% 2 <br />28.5% 0 <br />0. 1 % <br />10.1 40 $ 5.1345.1375 17.7% 19.9% -2.2% <br />Actual' colu.mn depicts the percentage spent compared to the budget <br />Norm' column depicts the percentage of expenditures we normally incur during this period as measured over the <br />previou.s 3 years <br />❖ `Diff' column depicts the difference between the percentage actually spent and the percentage we typically incur. A <br />percentage difference of 10%, or more in this cola would be considered significant <br />Expenditure Comments <br />In total,, citywide expenditures are near expected levels with a few notable exceptions. They include.- <br />1) Information technology expenditures have been purposely withheld to help offset higher-than- <br />expected expenditures in prior years. <br />2) Storm drainage expenditures are lower than expected, but consistent with amounts spent in 2005. <br />The fluctuations are due to changes in capital spending related to vehicle purchases and system <br />improvements. <br />Final Comments <br />The City's overall financial condition remains strong. During the I't quarter, the City typically relies on <br />cash reserves to pay for on-going expenditures in between property tax collection periods. At this time, <br />there does not appear to be any financial concerns. However, continued monitoring will be made <br />throughout the year. <br />POLICY OBJECTIVE <br />The information presented above satisfies Resolution 410503 which was adopted on May 21, 2007. <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />