|
4
<br />"R
<br />We the ne"ghborhood have a petAtion signeid by 66 re.3deMS. Of' Roseville
<br />and 43 resi"dents of St* Anthony Village. These resideilts are from houses,
<br />duplexes, condominiums and aplartmen,ts sur,roundingi, the the piroplosed area.
<br />We have enclos,eid a print of this site and the adjacent neighboring site, which
<br />we think �could be 6 residential l,ots. THIS IS WfIIA7WE D�E'SIRE IF ROSEVILLEVI
<br />WOULD APPROVE OF THE LOT SIZES. We are willing to work with the Owners and The
<br />City of Roseville 'in assisting to m"-e this possible. V
<br />The neighborhood d3id, reque-st the Planning Gortimissl0in *tfr'% 4i
<br />9,3A,ei some a,dvi"ce
<br />on wb-i,t we iciould do to, get this, area changed on the long range, plan, so we dx)n't
<br />have to defend lolur proiplerity, against rezoning t,o commer,cial every two years.
<br />THIS IS, THE SAME PROPOSAL THAT WAS REJECTED TWO YEARS AGO,, - AND QUITE FRMNMLT,
<br />WE ARE MORE UNITED OiN THIS SUBJECT THAN, AT' THAT MLE1.
<br />This is, a, quote from, the Roseville Focus, datied June '71, 1,989, and I think
<br />Frank Rog's remark is very appropriate for our areia al;-so-
<br />This is and sh,ould be in the future, a RESIDENTIAL AREA ONLYI
<br />smgie4eni faniffy
<br />.Plans for Concordia
<br />Academy's field — if land
<br />opens � Just part of, a
<br />push, to, bring', more single-
<br />family housing, to Roseville.
<br />do
<br />6
<br />We need single -family
<br />homes, desperately in this
<br />cityll ply said Pat, Johnson',
<br />chairwoman of the
<br />0
<br />Roseville PlannMg Com-,
<br />* a'
<br />Mmion.
<br />"There's so little land left
<br />to develop,", Rosevine Clity
<br />Council Member Bob Mate-,
<br />son said. "I think we need
<br />I
<br />tO ca0talize on -that to keep
<br />uS a residential commo-
<br />lit
<br />tya
<br />The city has lost 6,o
<br />houses 'in the past, few years
<br />to commercial devel p-
<br />me'nts around Pavilion,
<br />Place, Rosedale, Comm,ons
<br />and Centre Point, an office
<br />110M
<br />es backed
<br />complex now under, con,.
<br />e re M a ftVM
<br />e a d
<br />-Tonight (Wednesidaiy) a
<br />ICI roposal, 90es before the
<br />planning Commission that
<br />would situate, seven new
<br />bouses around a SkWman
<br />Avenue cul-de-sac off Fair-
<br />view Aven�ue.
<br />Ust month the city counwi
<br />CH approved plans to tear
<br />down t,he Roseville
<br />Greenhou.se and construct
<br />10 h�ouses, on Roiselawn
<br />Avenue between Prior, and,
<br />Cleve1and avenues. D�evel,-
<br />Ver'Gordie Hou�ei has Pm
<br />Posed Une houses
<br />ela ch
<br />'worth beltw,ftn $=11WO and
<br />$Mr".
<br />Fr* an was, g i, van t tie p i t i an and t he' pi r, i nt at t [j E-,-, I as t c C)un c i I me t i n
<br />The attac-hed page, explains past history and some reasons, We opiposie this
<br />proposal,
<br />zi
<br />
|