My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_8011
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
08xxx
>
8000
>
res_8011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:21:36 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 12:27:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
8011
Resolution Title
Establishing Policies in Conjunction with the Pavement Management Program
Resolution Date Passed
9/8/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />\, <br /> <br />PAVEMENT MANAGE~ffiNT PROGRAM POLICIES <br /> <br />( <br /> <br />PROGRAM <br /> <br />1. The 20 year program of pavement maintenance, resurfacing and reconstruction, <br />together with associated drainage projects will be ~tarted at once. <br /> <br />2. All roadways would be evaluated, and a rating genercted. Said ratings <br />would be grouped into three categories. Ratings between 56 and 100 would <br />be termed "adequate". Ratings between 36 and 55 wOlld be termed "marginal". <br />Rating between 0 and 35 would be termed "problem". <br /> <br />3. The program would be implemented by neighborhoods wcenever possible. The <br />selecting and prioritization of work for such neightorhoods would be done <br />by the council. <br /> <br />4. The City objective is to reduce the amount of "probJem" streets to 10% or <br />less within 8 years and thereafter to hold the "protlem" percentage to no <br />more than 10%. <br /> <br />STREET RECONSTRUCTION <br /> <br />5. In order to accomplish the objective, the City will undertake a program of <br />street reconstruction that would reconstruct all thE 28 miles of "problem" <br />streets within an 8 year period. These and subseqUEnt projects would be <br />initiated by council initiative if necessary. <br /> <br />( <br /> <br />6. The staff will send letters to adjacent streets in c. neighborhood advising <br />them that a problem roadway is to be done. This wi: 1 allow them to consider <br />if they desire to petition for their street to be d<ne at the same time. <br /> <br />7. The frontage street rating will be used to establisll the actions and <br />priority when reconstruction is the required action Side streets will <br />be done in conjunction with their associated front~e streets. <br /> <br />8. The city will accept petitions for the reconstructi( In of "marginal" streets <br />if they are signed by at least fifty percent of the involved frontage. <br />This is being done because they would be done anywa:' during the program <br />period. These streets would be assessed at the sam<<: rate as "adequate" <br />streets. The City, however, may for fiscal purpose:, defer the reconstruction <br />of such "marginal" projects for street reconstructi( In. <br /> <br />9. "Adequate" streets that petition after December 31, 1986 would be accepted, <br />but the petition is to be signed by at least two-th: .rds of the involved <br />frontage. The City may, however, for fiscal purposl:s defer the reconstruction <br />of such "adequate" projects. <br /> <br />10. The city will accept petitions for street reconst~lction from any street <br />until December 31, 1986 and consider its appropria1.eness based on the <br />typical aspects being used until this date. <br /> <br />11. All reconstruction of streets which are done duri~; a construction year <br />, will be consolidated together at assessment time to produce a single <br />\- residential assessment rate (regardless of width, nubbase problems, or <br />proportion of frontage vs. sidelot, etc.) <br /> <br />12. The assessment policy as established in Resolution 7506 would remain <br />unchanged except for eliminating the 22% rate poss.ibility. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.