2011_1121_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Attachment F EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City 2 of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was held on the 21St day of November 2011 at 6:00 3 p.m. ,4 The following Members were present: ; 5 and were absent. 6 Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 8 A RESOLUTION APPROVING MINNESOTA STATE FAIR PARK AND RIDE 9 FACILITIES AS INTERIM USES AT SEVERAL INSTITUTIONAL LOCATIONS '10 (PF07-017) WHEREAS, Minnesota State Fair is a co-applicant for approval of the proposed interim '12 uses with the church and school district leadership of the following nine locations: Calvary 1 3 Baptist Church, 2120 Lexington Avenue; Grace Church, 1310 County Road B2; Roseville Area 14 Nigh School, 1240 County Road B2; Centennial United Methodist Church, 1524 County Road 15 C2; North Como Presbyterian Church, 965 Larpenteur Avenue; St. Michael's Lutheran Church, '16 1660 County Road B; Church of Corpus Christi, 2131 Fairview Avenue; Roseville Covenant 17" Church, 2865 Hamline Avenue; and St. Rose of Lima Catholic Church, 2048 Hamline Avenue; 18 and '19 WHEREAS, the Roseville Planning Commission held the public hearing regarding the proposed CONDITIONAL USE on November 2, 2011, voting to recommend approval of the 21 use based on the comments and findings of the staff report prepared for said public hearing; and 22 f} WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council has determined that approval of the proposed 23 INTERIM USE will not result in adverse impacts to the surrounding properties based on the 24 following findings: 25 a. The proposed INTERIM USE will not impose additional costs on the public if it is 26 6 necessary for the public to take the property in the future, because the park and ride ' facilities represent a temporary intensification of the use of existing parking lots and thus 28 would not have any negative effects to the properties involved that would not occur from 29 the normal use of the parking lots over the long term; 30 b. That the majority of public comments on the additional traffic and the 31 inconvenience of people parking on the street or in front of mailboxes also include a 32 recognition that the short-term inconvenience is tolerable because of the great value of 33 the park and ride facilities, is evidence that the INTERIM USE does not constitute an 34 excessive burden on streets, parks, or other facilities; and Page 1 of 14