My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1989_1207_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1989
>
1989_1207_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/18/2011 11:29:48 AM
Creation date
11/18/2011 11:09:27 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
230
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7 ine Associates/Rosevilifle Community Bank,, Case No. 2032 Page 4 <br />The Ordinance further states that.- <br />Fire Marshal Considerations <br />To our knowleidge, t' ere 'is no principle co ncern here. The Fire Marshal <br />shall examine fire hydrant locations and concur with the life safety <br />code of the City of Roseville.1 <br />Comprehensive P'lan References <br />The Comprehensive Plan indicates the property in quest-ion to be <br />ilevieloped for business purposes. The development is consistent with <br />land use and zoning requireiments, <br />The application, is fo�ri approval of' preliminary plat, PUD, Special Use <br />Permit for Site Plain approval, andi temporary building. You will note in <br />this replort that no reference is made to the specifics of the temporary <br />build"ing proposed. This concept was discussed 'with the applicant <br />regarding the devielopment • a teimiporary build'ing for up to six months <br />,jvn the bank site so as to co�nform to charter req�uirements. However, <br />without specifliC pr,oplosals, it is difficult to consider the merit of this <br />concept., Therefore, we suggest that with respect, to this proposal, no <br />2ction should bie taken until, such t,ime when specific drawings and <br />glatements are sulibmitited describing such interim development. <br />The Preliminary Plat and the RUD could be considered for approval <br />subject to <br />Requirement for sidewalks to be built on contiguous public <br />streets; <br />b) Dedication of money in lieu of park land as required; <br />c) Final review of' en gineeri,ng and landscape, plains, by Staff; and <br />4P <br />d) Approval of Special Use Permit for bank, sub o. ject t <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.