My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1989_0515_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1989
>
1989_0515_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/21/2011 2:12:01 PM
Creation date
11/21/2011 2:07:31 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page th,ree <br />April 20, 1981 <br />In our opinion, the follow1nig applers to be the prevan.-t <br />Lavir 90 <br />"Has the City author ity to play, a cash <br />NI <br />bonus 3[n l,ieu olf the vacation period, <br />a <br />aft,er the employee bas voluntarily <br />11 <br />ries igneiid? <br />101 a <br />The Attorney General in, th&t opi,n:L,oin responded: <br />I I a 4 <br />WOO It is my opin,ion that the <br />payment, to be miade for an earned <br />vacation on the retirement olf an <br />empiloyee must be authorized 'in advance <br />and as a o h i,s salariyi basis. if <br />,part f " <br />tblere is no such arrangement between <br />the city and its employees, the <br />payment foir service that 'has not been <br />render,ed would be a gratuity and <br />illegal, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.