My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1989_0424_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1989
>
1989_0424_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/22/2011 9:48:32 AM
Creation date
11/22/2011 9:33:42 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
154
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page three <br />Ap <br />a 101 <br />In our opinion, the following appers to be the prevailing <br />V-aw <br />I I - <br />The Attorney, Gieneria,li'si opinion also aippears to be consistent <br />1-th our s,tatement. The Attorney General cited a previous <br />wi <br />*PinJ.on given to the City of Red 'Winig. <br />0 0 <br />In the Red Wing Opinilone the City gave each police off icer <br />11 <br />ioln every year One Police off <br />two weeks vacat icer resignei <br />h 1i <br />empillolyment July, Had he stayed on the payroll until <br />I <br />August he would be entitled to twol weleks, vacation, <br />The City Attorney, asked <br />"Has the City authority to pay a cash <br />bonus in, lieu of the vacation, period, <br />after the employee has voluntarily <br />resigned?"" <br />The Attorney General in that opinilon responde <br />10 4 Ill <br />I t is my opon that the <br />payment to bell ma,ide for an, earned <br />vacation on the retirement of' an <br />employlee m,usit 'be authorized 'in advance <br />a nid a s a, part of hi,s salary basise if <br />t,h e, rl e i i si no such arrangement between <br />the,, c ity and 'its, employeessi t'I'llll <br />payment for service that ha,s not been <br />renderied would 'be a gratuity and <br />illeigal <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.