Laserfiche WebLink
1, February 1989 <br />MW <br />City of Rosevillt'll <br />A,men�dment to Subdivision <br />Regulations Requiring Park <br />Deidication of Subdivisions <br />over Five Acres <br />161 Each of' you willi have relce'ved a, copy of the minutes from the last <br />issues ■ ions, <br />Planning Commission meeltiing at which time the i ) opt' and <br />needs were discussed. Thiere seems to be, general consensus on the <br />following points. <br />It) Th�ere is a, growing need for aidditional park land due to the loss <br />I I I I I I <br />of seven schoolsi s"tes with"I the communfty in the last decade. <br />11 t, 0 <br />e) I is reasonable to, require a park dedication of approximately 10 <br />percenit similar to mo,s�t, of the communities in the Metropolitan <br />Area. <br />f) Comm�ericia,l and industrial. land should al,so require dedication, but <br />I <br />perhaps at a smaller percentage due to its relatively higher value.. <br />0 <br />g)i Multiple family land should require dedi,ca,tion of park land. <br />h) Money should be required in lieu of land where land dedication is <br />inappropriate. <br />2, For Your convenience, we <br />have briefly su,mImarized <br />the land <br />use <br />dedication policies established <br />by fifteen communities. <br />Mr. Jopke <br />has <br />received copies of these communities' ordinances, or <br />he received <br />the <br />inforimat,ion over the phone. <br />Appended to this, report <br />on blue paper) <br />are ten sheets stating this <br />sum mary.1 Those communities (printed <br />in <br />bold type preceded by an, <br />asterisk) are those for <br />which the <br />full <br />ordinance text, is an file. <br />