Laserfiche WebLink
Page 2 <br />Steve No�rth <br />January 271 198,* <br />�Wd <br />C <br />groundwater, to determine whether or not there is groundwater <br />contamination. If the groundwater is determined to be <br />contaminated after a sampling program, will be necessary ts, <br />1 0 <br />drill and maintain, moni'toring wells to monitor groundwater <br />condit ion . <br />I <br />At this point, it appears that several alternatives would be <br />available,, These would include the, following'. <br />11 <br />Immediately procleedinq with the testing and monitoring <br />program as proposed by Braun. This alternate would <br />0' 1 <br />require discussing the matter, further with the city <br />council and arranging financing for the additional <br />Costse <br />0 4 <br />2. Discussing the matter further with the PCA and asking <br />for a delay, in, the sampling program, so this item could <br />be budgeted. This alternative would contemplate that <br />the additional, monitoring program would take place in <br />19910* It would, allow the city to budget for the <br />u,na,nt ilic ipated, extra monitoring cos L.;:), * <br />3* Solicit proposals from one or two additional testing <br />firms to determine the competitiveness of the Braun <br />pirolplosal. This alternative would simply delay <br />& F <br />implementing the monitorinig program f or several weeks <br />to determine, whether or not the Braun proposal is the <br />most cost effect live. <br />