Laserfiche WebLink
Page two <br />June 131ri 1981 <br />Tom INCreloghton is of the or)inion that since the council has the <br />ultimate responsibility and 'is tihe final regulatory authority of <br />the ciable sysitem in, the 0 City of lRosevillep that being familiar <br />with the cable system mi ight be in tiheii public interest, s4milar <br />to counicil members attlending conventions, and so forth, <br />Mr. Cre,lighton is the, Cable Commission attorney. He believes thil <br />City could find siu,ch expenditure tio be a public purpose. if th <br />City detex-miLnes it i,s in the publi A ic interest,, then we would <br />concur. i <br />would recommend#, howeverr before making such an expenditure, <br />the City Council put in the minutes a finding that all members of <br />'the City Council sihould be famil" <br />liar with cable television <br />programming to fulfill, the obligation of regulating suchA, <br />RCB/ap <br />cic: Frank Rog <br />James Andri=' <br />Very truly yours, <br />Robert C. Bell <br />City Attorneys, Citiy of Roseville <br />~ <br />