My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2011_1114
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2011
>
CC_Minutes_2011_1114
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2011 3:22:37 PM
Creation date
12/1/2011 3:22:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/14/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,November 14, 2011 <br /> Page 23 <br /> maintaining its parks and facilities; and to take two (2) parcels off the tax rolls <br /> and not ask public opinion on spending their taxpayer monies to do so, and then <br /> turning around and asking them to pay for maintaining more parkland and facili- <br /> ties, created a huge issue for her. <br /> In response to Councilmember McGehee's comment on the City's tax based, <br /> Councilmember Willmus noted that school properties were not included on the <br /> City's tax rolls. <br /> Johnson moved, Willmus seconded, formally allocating the 2011 Bond proceeds <br /> fro the construction of a new fire station and park improvements; based on staff <br /> recommendation that $5 million be allocated for the fire station, and $5 million <br /> for the park improvements for this initial funding package. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that the plan going forward was more than $5 million for parks, <br /> and the fact that having $5 million available for the first issue didn't ensure all <br /> projects listed would be done before the next issue. <br /> Councilmember Pust asked if Mayor Roe was stating that the public could not re- <br /> ly on the money being spent on the itemized list read into the record earlier by <br /> City Manager Malinen. <br /> Mayor Roe clarified that this was not his statement and that his intent was to note <br /> that the City Council approved their support of over $5 million in park improve- <br /> ment projects; and that the next bond issue would provide additional funding for <br /> further expenditures; with first dollars in and first dollars out. <br /> Councilmember Pust reiterated that the first $5 million was intended for park- <br /> related improvements and maintenance according to the list. <br /> City Manager Malinen concurred; however, he noted that if savings could be <br /> found for some of those projects now, it would allow more funding for other pro- <br /> jects; and expressed hope that the City Council remained receptive to working off <br /> the total menu of park improvements outlined through the Master Plan implemen- <br /> tation process. <br /> Councilmember Pust stated that the public needs to know where the $5 million <br /> was intended to be spent; and they should be able to rely that it will be spent ac- <br /> cordingly; and if more money was to be spent later, it was a different question, in- <br /> cluding $1.6 million designated toward new land purchases. <br /> Mayor Roe concurred; however, he noted that the costs were estimated; and simi- <br /> lar to the fire station, the City was attempting to allocate funding toward those <br /> purpose based on the best information available. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.