CC_Minutes_2011_1114 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday,November 14, 2011 Page 22 money; and if there was competing interests in the City, the public should be privy to that discussion. Councilmember McGehee reiterated concerns expressed at previous meetings that this whole process was out of sync. Mayor Roe stated that there was not competition,just an allocation of projects be- ing funded with this initial bond issue; based on staff's perspective and staff-level discussions. Mayor Roe noted that, as staff indicated in their report, if the City Council chose to provide equal funding to the two (2) different projects at this point in time, there would be no issues with the projects, with arbitrage or the IRS. Council nember Johnson advised that he intended to support both projects to their fruition; and noted that while the Fire Station was estimated at $8 million total; the total parks allocation was estimated to be $19 million. Councilmember Willmus concurred, noting that they were all City needs,just dif- fering opinions in how best to allocate this first $10 million issue; and opined that by splitting it 50/50, it was not putting one department ahead of the other; and since both departments continued to perform their due diligence with their identi- fied projects; the Fire Department had admitted that they would not be spending $8 million between now and the first half of 2012. Councilmember Pust stated that, if this was the only public discussion before al- location, she needed the itemized list of park projects and their estimated costs read into the record; with City Manager Malinen proceeding to do so Mayor Roe noted that this City Council-approved plan was presented and ap- proved on October 10, 2011. Noting the land acquisition costs included in this list, Councilmember Pust stated that she had an issue with that; opining that the City Council couldn't just arbitrar- ily decide they were purchasing land for a certain dollar amount without public discussion or determination of whether it was available or without an appraisal. Councilmember Pust noted that there had yet to be any discussion with the School District, so why would the City want to set aside money for land purchases from them. Councilmember Pust noted that, when the parks allocation came forward, discussion was related to using it for maintenance of what the City currently had, and opined that it would be a mistake to use money upfront for parkland acquisi- tion instead of using it for maintenance of current facilities. Councilmember McGehee concurred with Councilmember Pust; stating that she was against this initially and continued to be opposed without additional public hearing. Councilmember McGehee noted that the City had a long history of not