Laserfiche WebLink
Jim Andre 2 March 9. 1987 <br />Immediately north of the bridge,, Dahlgren suggested that the City <br />work, with, Spa,ceii Center and Union Carbide to encourage the appro- <br />priate development.. As in, the case of Unisys, staff has been <br />11 <br />meeting with Space Ceinter and Union Carbide 'in terms of future <br />develoPment. Mri,. Dahlgren suggested, that the business zone be <br />I <br />extended wies�t tol include, more of the Standard oil site. <br />T'heilre were,, no ba,s ic disagreements on, the type of land use adj acent <br />to 31 5W W <br />Study Area 31: <br />PF'S recommended Study Area, 3 primarily for office service*1, Mr. <br />Dahigren recommended that a more restrictive industrial zone be <br />used in this area that could include features of freeway develop- <br />ment that would olve some commercial, use, <br />41 <br />Study Area 5. <br />There was no disagreement regarding this particular study area, <br />Study Area 6: <br />I <br />PF'S reconuneindeld this area as multi-fam,ily- Mr. Dahgren agreed <br />that a porition of the land to the north could be designated for <br />multii-famiLly;i hiowle'ver, some of the southern parcels should be <br />4 <br />designated for blu,siness,. <br />Study Area, 17: <br />1 <br />,D�ahlgiren and PFS appear to have agreed that where lot size <br />di 4 <br />permits, infill should, be multiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIfami'Lly. <br />The attached sheet depicts the agreement between Mr, Dah1gren and <br />the staff regarding the afiorlement,loned differences, <br />