Laserfiche WebLink
as traffic calming measures and efforts to make neighborhoods friendlier and <br />address amenities to ensure livable community results. <br />Mr. Schwartz noted that the TMP was initially brought forward by the City <br />Council to staff in January or February of 2011, as they asked staff to put it on the <br />PWET Commission's annual work plan, requesting them to consider it a priority <br />for providing a recommendation to the City Council. Mr. Schwartz suggested a <br />review of both City Council and PWET Commission meeting minutes from the <br />last several years for the sequence of discussions and charges to the PWET <br />Commission by the City Council. <br />Ms. Gardner questioned why the word "resident" was changed to "citizen" in the <br />TMP; and questioned if that meant that people living outside of Roseville would <br />be allowed input on neighborhood streets within the community. <br />Member Stenlund advised that, unless a business owner, that someone would <br />have no standing. Member Stenlund noted the need for Ms. Gardner to recognize <br />that there was also associated cost participation for neighborhoods or anyone to <br />bring forward a request, negating many requests unless those requesting a tool <br />were willing to fund a specific available option. <br />Member Vanderwall concurred, noting that part of the process for each request <br />was submission of a petition. <br />Ms. Gardner questioned, since the County Road C -2 vote was "rushed through" <br />on October 17, 2011, and this policy "conveniently didn't apply," at what point <br />would the TMP begin to apply to County Road C -2. <br />Page 9 of 16 <br />