Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Schwartz advised that, like most policies, the TMP would become effective <br />upon its adoption — and funding — by the City Council; and would be based on a <br />case -by -case consideration of requests and their nature, whether for temporary <br />traffic measures, requiring a traffic study, or other review. <br />Ms. Gardner questions the process of the TMP, once finalized by the PWET <br />Commission, at the City Council level. <br />In response to Mr. Toogood's perspective on inconsistent speed limits in some <br />areas, Mem er Vanderwall stated that the PWET Commission's focus and <br />discipline h e evelop the TMP aimed at neighborhood streets, not <br />arterial street . <br />Mr. Schwartz concurred, noting that potentially, there may be speed limit <br />inconsistencies; however, he noted that they would require a more comprehensive <br />review. Mr. Schwartz advised that speed consistencies had never been looked at <br />comprehensively throughout the City; since many of them were County roads. In <br />response to Mr. Toogood's question if the City could influence the County and <br />request a speed study, Mr. Schwartz cautioned that the state commissioner would <br />reset speed limits if indicated following a speed limit study, often resulting in <br />those speed limits being increased based on an average, and often the opposite of <br />Page 10 of 16 <br />