Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
suggested that Step 4 provided another opportunity for awareness of potential <br />estimated costs. <br />Member consensus was that staff should identify potential costs and steps in <br />the initial application, in Step 1. <br />issues identified from temporary strategies, process involved to remove? <br />(page 14 of the document; page 32 of the packet) <br />Chair DeBenedet suggested that procedures should generally be followed as <br />outlined in the pr ram; however, if removal of the request is initiated by the <br />benefitted area la uage should specify that: "...removal of strategies will be <br />completely charge to property owners." <br />Member Vanderwall questioned why the first portion of that language was <br />limited to safety /crash complaint issues for city- initiated implementation or <br />based on pending development, not existing issues. <br />Consensus of members was to include that language: "if removal is initiated to <br />accommodate new development or redevelopment, the developer is <br />responsible for costs, not the City." <br />Page 13 of 16 <br />