Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Schwartz noted that this should clarify that those costs were not charged <br />back to citizens when they paid for the initial installation; and the unfairness <br />of them then having to pay again for its removal. <br />Discussion included justification for removal or mitigation impacts for <br />removal; emergency or safety hazards; and cost responsibility for those <br />initiating the process as part of a neighborhood effort and discussion. <br />recommendation as presented with those minor revisions as addressed. <br />Funding Sources / Commitment <br />Mr. Schwartz noted that, if the TMP moved forward for recommendation to <br />the City Council, PWET Commissioners should be mindful that the TMP <br />currently had no available funding source for such a policy or its <br />implementation strategies; and questioned if the PWET Commission's <br />recommend should include further discussion on a recommendation to the <br />City Council on first -year funding for implementation of such a policy. <br />Member Gjerdingen suggested that "street closure" be removed as an option <br />in the TMP; or to add "street opening" as another tool option. <br />Page 14 of 16 <br />