My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-12-20_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2011
>
2011-12-20_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/15/2011 3:33:48 PM
Creation date
12/15/2011 3:27:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
12/20/2011
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Review of Trash presented in Table 1 above. As an example, if we assume an <br />Collection average of 6 rather than 8 total trash and recycling trips per week <br />for the current open competition system, the associated "Percent <br />Impacts of Total Vehicle Impacts" is 10.8% rather than the 14.0% for the <br />f' base case shown in Table 2. The associated reduction in the <br />"Percent of Total Vehicle Impacts" in this case is 3.4% (10.8% - <br />7.4 %) rather than 6.7 %. The corresponding reduction in the <br />"Allocated Portion of Total Annual Cost to Maintain Residential <br />Streets at Current Condition" would be approximately $86,000 <br />($272,000 - $186,000) rather than the $168,000 for the base case <br />($354,000 - $186,000) shown in Table 2. <br />Table 2 <br />COMPARISON OF OPEN COMPETITION AND DISTRICTED COLLECTION <br />`TRASH &RECYCLING VEHICLE IMPACTS <br />Total Trash& <br />Allocated Portion of <br />Recycling <br />Total Annual. Cost <br />Annual CO2 Emissions <br />to Maintain <br />Collection System <br />Vehicle Passes I <br />Percent of Total <br />- <br />Residential Streets <br />Week I <br />Vehicle Impacts <br />Residential <br />at Current <br />Condition <br />Pounds <br />Tons <br />Street <br />`($2008)' <br />Open Competition <br />8.0 <br />14.0% <br />$ 354,000 <br />542,000 <br />271 <br />Districted Collection <br />4.0 <br />7.4% <br />$ 186,000 <br />271,000 <br />136 <br />Reduction (Districted vs.Open )t'i <br />4.0 <br />6.7% <br />$ 168,060 1 <br />271;000 <br />136 <br />O1 The Districted Collection "Percent of Total Vehicle Impacts" and "Annual Cost to Maintain Residential Sheets at Current <br />Condition' is greater than half the calculated impacts for the Open Competition System due to the methodology used, which <br />assumes a constant number of vehicle trips for each scenario. <br />Section 2 - 6 <br />While the estimated impacts are subject to changes in the various <br />underlying assumptions, we believe that the analysis provides a <br />reasonable projection of the magnitude of trash truck impacts on <br />the City's residential streets, which is supported by various <br />independent third -party estimates. Appendix C (Comparative <br />Trash Truck Load Factors) provides a comparison of the <br />estimated passenger car equivalents estimated for the residential <br />trash and recycling trucks operating in the City to independent <br />references in support of the reasonableness of the estimates used <br />in our analysis. <br />Change in Street Design Standards <br />The City adopted new design standards for streets in 1999 that <br />are expected to increase the available vehicle loads streets can <br />handle over their lifetime. These new standards do not affect the <br />calculated percentage impacts of trash and recycling trucks on <br />residential streets, since that calculation is not based on street <br />design standards. Those standards would, however, be expected <br />to reduce annual maintenance costs over time. As a result, the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.