Laserfiche WebLink
X" <br />LT11Q1W,JMl <br />---------------- <br />AGENDA SECTION -, 1,0RIGINATING DEPT./M.'. <br />REPORTS AND, RECOMMENDAT1 Ill ONS PUBLIC WORKS <br />--------------- <br />ITEM DESCRIPTIOW selection of Bridge Consult,a,nt for <br />County Road, Bi-2 C-rossiniz of i-,35'W <br />%I- Project 84-16 <br />MGR. REVIEWED/ RECOM <br />'The final order of the ranking of the. firms was as follows: <br />0 <br />BRPI Incorporated <br />Short, Elliott and Hendrickson, Inc. <br />Strgar-Roscoe, Incorporated <br />A brief summar.ization, of' some of the items where the various firms excelled are as <br />folilows: <br />BR11 and STRGAR-ROSCOE both have done a number of large major projects <br />211. BRW and STRGAR-ROSCOE both have done similar bridge projects to open tax <br />incIement areas for development,., <br />,3., SIHOR,T., ELLIOTT and HENDRICKSON has had extensive community background <br />The next step of' the process would be for 'the, council to select the firm that they <br />feiel would, be the most appropriate for the work and then *instruct the staff to <br />enter into negotiations with that firm, in an effort to develop a mutually agreeable <br />renumieration plackage.1 If that is successful, then the contract would be developed <br />