2011_0228_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Attachment H 1 PUBLIC HEARING - PROJECT FILE 001 7 2 Request by the Roseville Planning Division t ©r a public hearing regarding amendments to the following '3 chapters ©t the Zoning Code: Introduction; Administration and Enforcement; Residential Districts; 4 Commercial a�nd Mixed Use Districts; Employment Districts; Institutional District; Shoreland,, Wetland, 5 a�nd Storm Wa�ter Management; a�nd Sexually Oriented Uses 6 Associate Pl�an�nec�r Bryan Lloyd briie'fl r re'viie'we'd those ch�apte'rs not iincl�ulde'd iin the focus of pre'viiou�s uIpdate's to 7' the re'vnse'd Zoning Code'; an�d additional nte'ms that were iIn�adve'rte'n�tl�y omliltte' d, chIapte'rs n1 ot re'wri�tte'n1 dulrilnl g the 8 comprehensive u�pdate', an�d/or as staff became aware ®t t1 it corre'ctnon�s an�d amec�n�dn�me'n�ts dulri�n day-to-day 9 use of the nec�w code'. Each re'm{ aiin�iin chIapte'r was then spe'ciifiical�l p re'se'n�te'd by staff an�d diisculsse'd amon�g 10 Commissioners an�d staff; an�d fuIrth�e�r de'tanl�e'd iln' the Re'q�ule'st t®r Planning Actnon dated Fe'brulary 2, 2011. 11 1001 — lntroduction� 12 Mr. Lloyd note'd that several se'ctiions hIad proven rc'dulnldanl t, an�d were thuu�s re'co�mmec�n�de'd for re'viisiions as 1'3 iin�diicate'd. 14 1002 — Adm{ iin�iistratiion an�d Enforcement 15 Mr. Lloyd note'd the addiitiion of a se'ctiion re'late'd to De�ve'l�opmec�n�t Agre'e'n�me'n�ts between the Ciity an�d De�ve'l�ope'r for .1 .1 16 more substantial projects an�d/or those re'q�uIi�ri�n additional formal environmental re'viie'w. Mr. Lloyd note'd thl at th�iis 1 7' add iitiion was pron�mpte'd by the re'ce'n�tl r propose�d asphall�t plant d ulriin 2010 to ensure specific steps were followed. 18 Diisculssiion iin�cl�uIde'd Se'ctiion 1002.03B an�d pe'n�diin de'te'rm� iinatiion of where best iin Ciity Code to address the 19 process an�d wouIl�d be fnnlal�nze'd pri�or to pre'se'n�tatn on to the Cilty CouIn1 ci11�; an�d nn�te'n�de'd infrastructure cost re'cove'ry 20 for de've'l�opmec�n�t iin the Twiin Lake�s Re'de've'l�opmec�n�t Area now thl at the Pl�an�nec�d Un�iit De�ve'l�opmec�n�t (PUCE) process 21 its no l�onge'r iin e'ffe'ct, while notiin thl at until coon pl�e'tiion of the Re' guIl�atiin Map an�d Plan, an fulrthec�r de've'l�opmec�n�t 22 iin the Twiin Lake�s area was on h�ol�d. 2'3 Mr. Paschke note'd thl at, when the zon�iin code was cre'ate'd an�d the Commercial Miixe'd Use District was 24 e�stabl�i�shIe' d, staff was aware thIat some orm l of agre'e'mle'n1t woul e n1e'e' de' d, whIe'thIe'r in1 a specific chIapte'r or a 25 separate produIct con�taiinec�d wiith�iin a portiion of the Plan an�d Re' guIl�atiin Map. After adoptiion of the Zoning Code', 26 Mr. Paschke adviise'd thl at staff Mad con�cl�ulde'd thl at iit sh�oull�d be addre'sse'd as a separate an�d distinct se'ctiion�, an�d 2 7' not specific to one area, such as Twiin Lakes s, since iit hind the potential for re'q�uIiire'd appl�iicatiion i�n1 othIe'r sntulatnonls 28 as well iin the fultulre'. Mr. Paschke note'd that re'q�u iiriin such environmental re'viie'w was not soon e'th�iin nec�w, bust Mad 29 be'e'n uIn�de'r diisculssiion for some tiimec�, bust until the Zoning Code rewrite was uIn�de'rtake�n�, there was no nec�e�d to '30 address iit formn all r. FuIrth�e'r diisculssiion iin�cl�uIde'd how cost al�l�ocatiions wou�l�d be diistriibulte'd, based on minimum an�d maximum ' 2 thre�sh�ol�ds for m{ iitii gatiion re'q�uIiire'mle'nts an�d mec�chan�iisms available for the immediate de've'l�opmec�n�t site as well as '3'3 the broader, more re' giion�al�, are�a iin the Alternative Urban Area-wide Re'viie'w (AUAR) are�a an�d re�l�ated proportiional 314 costs impacting u. tnl�ntne's, roadways, based on traffnc ge'n�e�rate'd stuldne's, an�d storm water manlage�mle'n1t; hIow costs .1 '35 were cal�cull�ate'd for the re'ce'n�tl�y-con�strulcte'd Me'tropol�iitan� Transit Park an�d Ride Facility an�d com�pari�sons with the .1 36 propose�d De�ve'l�opm�e�n�t Agre'e'm�e'n�t an�d pre'viiou�s PUD Agre'e'mle'n�t re'q�uIi�re' me'n�ts wiith doculmec'n�tatiion iin place N3 7' specifically describing the cal�cull�atiion ratiionalI�e'. ' 8 Additional diisculssiion iin�cl�uIde'd sufficient guidance iin othec�r Roseville l�ocatiions be'yon�d the Twiin Lake's 'N�39 Re'de've'l�opmec�n�t Area that provnde'd that n�me'th�odol�ogy for de've'l�opmec�n�ts; additional mil�til gatilon provnde'd by fulrth�e�r 40 environmental revi �Ie�w; typical use of ve' hIiIc e's pe'r day traffiIc stul diIe's to determine the proport11on1 of mliltilgat11on1 for 141 each de've'l�opmec 1 t; an�d the process of an�d siitulatiions or trilgge'r mle'chlan�iisms where fulrthec�r environmental re'viie'w 42 its itn' ditcate'd. 4'3 Staff provnde'd several past e'xam�pl�e's of m�aj'or de've'l�opm�e�n�ts an�d the process that wou�l�d be i�m�pl�e'm�e'n�te'd Under 14-14, the n�e�w zoning code re�q u�iIre�m�e�n�ts. 45 Consec�nsuu�s of Commissioners was that these n�e�w re'q�uIiIre'mec�n�ts n1 o create fulrthec�r delays or undue bulrde'ns on 46 potential de've'l�ope'rs as l�on as there were n1 o obviiou s negative impacts to the h�e'al�thl , safe'ty an�d welfare of 4 7' cittitze'n" s an" d th�e'itr prope�rtite�s. 48 Mr. Paschke advnse'd th1 at, iln' order for a roj�t to be aproed ow or i�n1 the past, the Cilty re'q u1iIre' d thIat the 49 de've'l�opmec�n�t complete a PuIbl�ilc Improvement Project Agre'e'mle'n�t, whec�thec�r additional environmental re'vne'w was 50 nn�dncate'd or n1 ot; an�d clarified that the proposed De�ve'l�opm�e'n�t Agre'e'mle'n�t cove're'd somec'th�inn much broader than 51 the PuIbl�iIc Improvement Agre'e'n�me'n�t an�d sh�ouIl�d address all siltu. atilon1s where pulbl�ilc itmlprove' mle'n�ts and /or other 52 type's ®t are�a inmmprove'mec'n�ts are n�e�ce'ssary. Page 1 of 3