2011_0228_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Attachment H 5'3 1004 — Residential Districts 54 Mr. Lloyd n�ote'd the re'viisiion s re'late'd to desip guIiide'l�iin�e's on garage's, with n�o ch�an�ge's to requirements, bult 55 providing fuIrth�e�r clarification; an' revi �Ie�we'd subtle distinctions iIn� those revi �Isi1on�s an' re�fe're�n�ce's, which will be 56 fulrth�e'r de'tanl�e'd iln snde'bar cormrme'n�ts t ®r illustrative pu�rpose's once the Sections are formatted. 5 7' DiIscuIssiIon nn�cl�ulde'd identifying primary bu�ill�diln face te'rm�nn�ol�ogy and nn�te'n�t; how objective staff de'te'rrmnn�e's cou�l�d 58 be re'late'd t® predominant de'sil gn�, whe'the'r nn�te'rpre'te'd by snze', visual ae'sth�e'tnc ®r both, an�d con�snste'n�cy ®t 59 re'q�ule'sts me'lde'd by staff t ®r front fagade home improvements. 60 Me'rmbe'r Boe�rn gte'r re'rmnn�de'd staff ®t h�i�s ongoing lack ®t su�pport t ®r snde'bar ill�l ,llstratilon�s thl at cou�l�d be nn�te'rpre'te'd 61 as proscriptive rath�e'r than siirmpl se'rviin as e'xarmpl�e's. 62 Mr. Lloyd al�so n�ote'd corre'ctiion�s to se'tback re'q�uliire'rme'n�ts, an�d addiitiion of a footnote for fu�rth�e'r clarification an�d 6'3 providing more flexibility iin HD R-2 Districts u pon re'viie'w and approval by the Planning Commr iissiion and Ciity &4 Couln�ciil�. 65 Table 1005-1 — Commercial and Mixed-Use Districts 66 Mr. Lloyd noted the on�l r change on page 2 u�n�de'r "Nu rsiin Horme', Assisted Living Faciil�iity" u se's thl at head 6 7' iin�adve'rte'ntl be'e'n ormi�tte�d between vari�ou�s drafts. 68 Ditscu, ssilon' itn' CIu, de'd future arme'n' drme'n' is cormitn' forward for fu, rthie�r re�fitn�e�n�me'n' t of daycare�s an' d sitm� itl�ar facifl�iItite�s 69 de'pe'nding ®n th�e'i�r size as t® where pe'rm�i�tte'd u�se's; and separate and distinct con�si�de'rati�on� ®t dormitories th�at 7'0 have gre'ate'r impacts due t® vehicle traffi�c ve�rsu�s a Nu�rsi�n�g Home ®r si�m�iI ar use when m�aniy of those re'siI de'nits 7'1 wou�l�d not be driving. 7'2 1008 — Park and Re'cre'ation District 7`3 Mr. Lloyd re'viie'we'd formatting change's and re'organ�iizatiion� of th�iis Se'ctiion� siim�iil�ar to the formatting and structure of T4 tit ch�apte'rs; as well as re'n�amil�n owe' d Use's." 7'5 1009 — Proce'du re's 7'6 Mr. Paschke noted that, when on mall r drafting th�ils se'ction, a separate l�ilstiln head been u�se�d for "Nu� rsiln�g 7`7 Horme's" from "Assiste'd Living Facilities" and sh�oull�d have been cornbine'd. 7'8 1017 — Sh�ore'l�and, wetland and Storrm Wate'r Management 7'9 Mr. Lloyd noted change's were pre'diicate'd on iirmpl�e'rme'ntatiion of the ne'w Zoning Code and re'rnoviin g references to 80 PUD)l s; as well as ch�an iln the enforcement language to be consistent, with oth�e�r revisions basilcal�l�y cre'ate'd 81 through itn adve'rte�n�t errors an d e�m�itssiton�s an" re �n u�m�be�ritn�g se�ctiton�s after striking ou�t those are" as specific to 82 PUD)l S. 8'3 Commissioners noted the ac'e'd to correct the identificationn iin the Sh�ore'l�an�d Cl�assiifiicatiion Table for McCarron�"s &4 Lake and Lake Owasso. 85 1019 - Parking and Loading Areas 86 Mr. Lloyd noted the m{ iinor re'viisiionn was siin{m pl for con�siiste'ncy with oth�e'r se'ctiionns. 8 7' Ch�aiir Boe�rii gte'r ope'ne'd the Pu�bl�iic Hearing for PROJECT FILE 0017 at 8:21 p.m�. 88 Public Comment 89 Dick Klick, 2099 Fairway South 90 Mr. Klick spoke to garage setback re'q�uliire'rne'nts, u siin h its ne'iigh�borh' ood as an example and q�u�e�stiionniin the 91 rationale for such a re'q�uliire'rme'nt. 92 Ch�aiir Boe�rii gte'r re'viie'we'd the majority 11s rationale iin encouraging pe'de'striian�-friie'ndl r buliil�diin fronts for future 9'3 residential ne'ii gh�borh' odds, re'iite'ratiin h�iis lack of su pport for the re'q�uliire'rme'nt and iin agre'e'rne'nt with Mr. Klick. 94� DitscuIssiIon e'n�suIe'd re' garditn varilou. s sce'n�arilos for re'mmode'l�iIn or chitin itn e'xitstitn stru�ctulre's and how to compl ' 95 with this ne'w re'q�ulire'rme'nt; th�re'sh�ol�ds that wou�l�d trigger compliance base'd ®n varilouis factors; and cu�rre'nt State 96 Statute provilsilon�s addressing the ac'e'd t® re'bulil�d stru�ctu�re's that are cu�rre'ntl r non-conforming. 9 7' Ch�ailr Boe'n gte'r noted that the intent ®f the desip standards was t® create stre'e'ts that were pleasant and inviting, 98 and e'mphasize'd the l�ilviln area as the primary fulnncti ®n ®f the buIiIl�diIn f ®r residential u�se'. 99 Mr. Lloyd adviise'd that th�iis viewpoint was iiniitiiate'd through the pu bl�iic comment end ve'ttiin g du riin g the Imagine 100 Roseville 2025 com�m�u�n�iity visioning process end the Comprehensive Plan Update process for pe'de'striian�-friie'ndl r 101 stre'e'ts end the viisiion of th�iis re'q�u�iire'me'nt was to accomplish thl at goal. 102 Mr. Klick opiine'd that h�iis ne'ii gh�borh' ood wou�l�d be more pe'de'striian-friie'ndl r iif iit h�ad stre'e'tl�ii gh�ts. Page 2 of 3