Laserfiche WebLink
Public Safety. "I want to feel safe any time, anywhere <br />in Mesa County." <br />iiiiiiiiiiiiiii Public Health. "I want a healthy Mesa County." <br />Public Resources. "I want Mesa County to have <br />well-managed resources. 1) <br />A strategic plan, vision, or mission statement can be the <br />starting point for identifying the priority results. Grounding the <br />priority results in these previous efforts can be helpful, as it <br />respects the investment stakeholders might have in them and <br />gives the priorities greater legitimacy <br />Developing the priorities is a critical point of citizen <br />involvement. The governing board must also be closely <br />involved. Familiar tools such as citizen surveys, focus groups, <br />and one-on-one interviews work well, too. <br />UT M-111 r0 • <br />IT&M.T271M M @=' <br />The jurisdictions that participated in the CF A's research <br />offered two alternatives for funding support services. Some <br />suggested creating a ii good governance" priority that addresses <br />high-quality support services.This gives support services a <br />clear place in PDB, and allows them to evaluate program <br />relevance against the strategic results they are asl<ed to <br />achieve. Here is how the City of Walnut Creel, California, <br />defined its governance goals- <br />lity and innovation <br />in all city business. <br />Provide superior customer service that is responsive <br />and demystifi es city processes. <br />IIIIIIIIIIIIIII Provide analysis and long-range thinl<ing that supports <br />responsible decision mal<ing. <br />IIIIIIIIIIIIIII Proactively protect and maintain city resources. <br />IIIIIIIIIIIIIII Ensure regulatory and policy compliance. <br />Other participants envisioned moving to a system that would <br />fully distribute the cost of support services to operating pro- <br />grams.Thus, the impact of any changes in the funding of these <br />services would be tied to the prioritization of the operating <br />services they support. <br />Intended Result: A set of priorities that are expressed <br />in terms of measurable results, are of value to citizens, <br />and are widely agreed to be legitimate. <br />3. Define Your Priority Results More Precisely. The <br />foundation of any prioritization effort is the results that define <br />why an organization exists. Organizations must ask what <br />makes them relevant to their citizens. Achieving relevance <br />providing the programs that achieve relevant results — is <br />the most profound outcome of a prioritization process. <br />The challenge is that results can be broad, and what <br />they mean for your community can be unclear. Take, for <br />instance, a result such as "pro iding a safe community," <br />which is shared by most local governments. Organizations <br />talk about public safety, or the provision of a safe community, <br />as if it were an obvious and specific concept. But is it <br />In the City of Wa I nu t Crash, Cal i fo rn ia, c itize ns, together with <br />city leadership, commonly identified issues of building safety <br />specific to surviving earthquakes as an important influence <br />on the safety of their community. In the City of Lakeland, <br />Florida, however, not a single citizen or public official dis- <br />cussed earthquakes in their work to help define the very same <br />April 2010 1 Government Finance Review I I <br />