My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011_0328_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2011
>
2011_0328_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2012 1:34:38 PM
Creation date
12/20/2011 12:00:09 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
k" <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Item Description: Approve Amendments to the 2 010 Budget <br />Date: 03/28/11 <br />Item No. 7. d <br />City Manager Approval <br />11 BACKGROUND <br />2 The City annually adopts budgets on the basis set forth by State Statute, and generally accepted accounting <br />3 principles. Although the City adopts a single all-encompas sing budget, additional measures are necessary <br />4, to show that all expenditures within the General Fund and certain Special Purpose Funds are within budget <br />5 appropriations, when presented in the annual financial statements. <br />6 <br />The legal level of budgetary control (i.e. the level at which expenditures may not legally exceed <br />appropriations) has been established at the fund level as opposed to line-item or individual programs. It is <br />recognized that the City's Department Heads, under the approval of the City Manager, may make transfers <br />of appropriations within the department. However, if the expenditures exceed the total fund budget, a <br />budget amendment must be shown. <br />It's worth noting, that these types of year-end adjustments are typical for local governments like Roseville <br />given the size and scope of operations. Rather than make numerous budget adjustments throughout the <br />year and incur the significant administrative costs of monitoring the budget on a daily basis, it is customary <br />to reflect the changes in one all-encompassing adjustment. The year-end budget adjustments typically <br />reflect reallocated or additional costs that are offset by unbudgeted grants, fees, or other revenues. <br />The following budget amendment to the 20 10 General Fund budget is submitted for consideration: <br />1) $ 177,000 in police equipment purchases funded by forfeiture funds. <br />2) $ 15,000 in Police overtime detail that was offset by federal and state monies for special <br />enforcement details. <br />3) $91,000 in Public Works engineering consulting services provided to the City of Arden Hills. The <br />additional costs were reimbursed by the City of Arden Hills. <br />Page I of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.