My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011_0328_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2011
>
2011_0328_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2012 1:34:38 PM
Creation date
12/20/2011 12:00:09 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment E <br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br />1 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City <br />2, of Roseville,, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was held on the 28th day of March 2011 at 6.-00 <br />3 p.m. <br />,4, <br />5 and <br />I <br />The following Members were present.* <br />were absent. <br />Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption.- <br />RESOLUTION NO. <br />A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT AS A <br />CONDITIONAL USE AT 2478 HAMLINE AVENUE (PF11-004) <br />10 WHEREAS,, James Carr,, applicant for approval of the proposed conditional use,, owns <br />11 the property at 2478 Hamline Avenue, which is legally described as.- <br />12, PIN: 10-29-2 3-�13-0029 <br />13 Horvath Addition, subject to easements, the E 117 ft. of the N 40 ft. of Lot 2 and <br />14 the E 117 ft. and N 48 ft. of Lot I Block I <br />15 WHEREAS,, the Roseville Planning Commission held the public hearing regarding the <br />16 proposed CONDITIONAL USE on March 2, 2011, voting 5-0 to recommend approval of the use <br />1 7, based on the comments and findings of the staff report prepared for said public hearin - and <br />91 <br />18 WHEREAS,, the Roseville City Council has determined that approval of the proposed <br />19 CONDITIONAL USE will not result in adverse impacts to the surrounding properties based on the <br />2,0 following findings.- <br />2,1 a. The proposed accessory dwelling unit is not in conflict with the Comprehensive <br />2,2, Plan because it advances land use Policy 7.4 by promoting increased housing <br />2,3 options in the community; <br />24 b. The proposed use is not in conflict with a Regulating Map or other adopted plan <br />2,5 because no such plans apply to the area surrounding the property; <br />2,6 C. The proposed use is not in conflict with City Code requirements, and the <br />conditional use approval can be rescinded if the use of the accessory dwelling unit <br />2,8 fails at anv time to COMDIV with all aDDlicable Code reouirements or conditions of <br />2,9 the approval; <br />30 d. The proposed accessory dwelling unit, which is suitable for up to two occupants, <br />31 will not create an excessive burden on parks,, streets,, and other public facilities; <br />32, and <br />33 e. The proposed accessory dwelling unit is a small residential use that will not be <br />34 injurious to the surrounding residential neighborhood, will not negatively impact <br />Page I of 3 <br />Page 1 of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.