Laserfiche WebLink
Attaclunent C <br />2011 BO et Ranking Methodology <br />9 <br />5- Items in this category, 'if not funded, are those that could <br />potentially compromise the physical well-being of individuals or <br />property. Examples are the inability of police or fire to respond to calls. <br />4- Items, in this category, if not, funded, i are those that could result <br />OW <br />in substantial increases lin the financial burden on the community in <br />subsequent years. Examples of this would be a failure to repair a street or replace <br />a capital asset. <br />3- Items in this category, if not funded, are those that could impede <br />the city's ability to provide the 'type of services that contribute to the <br />quality of life. Examples of this, would be funding for the cultural or social events. <br />2- Items in this category, If not funded, are those that wouldn't <br />likely affect individuals, in the community, but would impede the, <br />ability of' the city to fulfill its mission. An example of this, would be reduced <br />office maintenance. <br />0 <br />1 Items In this category, if not funded, are those that would have <br />little or no impact either on the community, or the city's ability to fulfill <br />M , '1 1, <br />Its mission, An example of this would be deferred rnowing. <br />