My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011_0411_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2011
>
2011_0411_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2012 4:22:02 PM
Creation date
12/20/2011 1:01:37 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attaclunent C <br />2011 BO et Ranking Methodology <br />9 <br />5- Items in this category, 'if not funded, are those that could <br />potentially compromise the physical well-being of individuals or <br />property. Examples are the inability of police or fire to respond to calls. <br />4- Items, in this category, if not, funded, i are those that could result <br />OW <br />in substantial increases lin the financial burden on the community in <br />subsequent years. Examples of this would be a failure to repair a street or replace <br />a capital asset. <br />3- Items in this category, if not funded, are those that could impede <br />the city's ability to provide the 'type of services that contribute to the <br />quality of life. Examples of this, would be funding for the cultural or social events. <br />2- Items in this category, If not funded, are those that wouldn't <br />likely affect individuals, in the community, but would impede the, <br />ability of' the city to fulfill its mission. An example of this, would be reduced <br />office maintenance. <br />0 <br />1 Items In this category, if not funded, are those that would have <br />little or no impact either on the community, or the city's ability to fulfill <br />M , '1 1, <br />Its mission, An example of this would be deferred rnowing. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.