My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011_0411_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2011
>
2011_0411_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2012 4:22:02 PM
Creation date
12/20/2011 1:01:37 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Event <br />DateLsj <br />26. <br />Budget Hearing on Proposed Levy [and Utility Rates] based on 2'd <br />Dec. 5 <br />DRAFT CM recommended 2012/13 Budget Expenditure Summary <br />and 2012/13 Capital Spending Plan (aka Capital Budget) <br />27. <br />Council approves final 2012/13 budget, levy, [and utility rates] <br />Dec. 5 or 12 <br />28. <br />Staff report to Council on status of Performance Measures <br />1St Quarter 2012 <br />implementation, and Council/Staff discussion about inclusion of <br />Performance Measures into the budget process going forward <br />29. <br />Staff report to Council on 2012 County Assessor's Report property <br />April 2012 <br />value changes for 2013, and preliminary tax base change estimate. <br />30. <br />First Quarter Financial Report <br />April 2012 <br />31. <br />Receive Auditors' Report on 2011 <br />April/May 2012 <br />32. <br />Second Quarter Financial Report <br />July 2012 <br />33. <br />Council-Staff Discussions on status of 2012/13 budget versus actual <br />August 2012 <br />costs and revenues to date <br />34. <br />Council sets final 2013 NTE levy (adjustment from 2012/13 total) <br />Sept. 2012 <br />[and any 2013 utility rate changes] <br />Budget Process Working Documents: <br />(Individual documents on the list maybe combined with each other as appropriate. Additional <br />documents maybe added in order to present additional information as appropriate.) <br />1. Program Listing Prioritization Methodology. Defines consensus as to what each ranking (I - <br />5), means. <br />2. Program Listing. List of programs and services, including the prioritization results for each <br />program. Upon completion of prioritization exercise, the list is to be sorted first by fund, then <br />by department or division, then by mandatory/non-mandatory, then by priority results <br />(initially sorted by previous prioritization results; later by updated results, when completed), <br />3. Program Descriptions. (ref: Attachment D of item 13a of Nov 15, 2010, agenda), Detailed <br />descriptions of the programs in the Program Listing, organized in the same order as the <br />I <br />Program Listing easy cross-reference). <br />%_� <br />4. Basic Budget Document. An accounting of budget information for each program in the <br />Program Listing, organized in the same order, with the current year's approved budget <br />amount, previous years' actual amounts as available),, and the proposed 2012/13 budget <br />amount for each program, including percent change from previous year in each case; also <br />�p I <br />includes revenue sources by fund. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.