My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011_0926_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2011
>
2011_0926_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2012 1:34:39 PM
Creation date
12/20/2011 2:11:12 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
163
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
k" <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Date: 9/26/11 <br />Item No.: 12 a <br />Department Approval City Manager Approval <br />Item Description: "Infrastructure Improvements for the Twin Lakes AUAR Area- Final Report" <br />Update <br />2 On February 25, 2008, the City Council adopted the "Infrastructure Improvements for the Twin Lakes <br />3 AUAR Area- Final Report". The purpose of the document was to develop proportionate cost share for <br />4, individual properties within the Twin Lakes area for the public infrastructure needed to support the <br />5 redevelopment. The Council approved an update of this report on April 12, 20 10. The attached map <br />6 and table show the 17 roadway infrastructure improvements that make up the network of public street <br />"7 improvements identified as mitigation measures in the AUAR. <br />8 In summary, the report developed overall cost estimates for the public infrastructure improvements. <br />9 We then estimated the traffic generation from each land use proposed as a part of AUAR Scenarios B & <br />110 C. and routed the PM peak hour trips through the network. This established a total number of network <br />11 trips for the planned build out of the Twin Lakes AUAR area. Using the total cost and total network <br />12 trips, the report established a cost allocation rate per network trip for each type of use; Residential, <br />13 Commercial- office and Commercial- retail. <br />14, The cost per network trip is a function of the total network trips contributed by a specific development <br />15 type. As development proposals come forward, their respective land uses are reviewed against the <br />116 assumptions contained in the study in order to determine that the specific cost per network trip value <br />1 7 and associated cost allocation amount is appropriate for the proposed use. <br />11 111",,'11 The City Council has requested that staff review the study on an annual basis in order to ensure that the <br />119 cost allocation rates assigned to redevelopment are consistent with the real costs to construct the public <br />20 improvements. In 20 10, the second phase of public infrastructure construction was completed. Upon <br />2i review of actual costs for the construction of the second phase of the public infrastructure construction, <br />22 we are recommending that we update the cost allocation rates to reflect the real costs for these public <br />23 improvements. <br />24, In light of the 20 10 zoning code update and feedback received from the City Attorney, staff has been <br />25 taking a close look at the methodology used to develop the original cost allocation distribution. There <br />26 are two main areas of focus, "2030 background traffic" and establishing a base line for network trips. <br />27 Over half of the AUAR traffic improvements occur on existing roads. Regardless of Twin Lakes <br />28 redevelopment, these existing roads will likely have more traffic in the future. This is called <br />29 "background traffic". A significant portion of the need for the 2030 improvements can be attributed to <br />30 this background traffic. However, the existing study methodology only allocates cost to background <br />3 1 traffic for four of the improvements. <br />32 The parcels in Twin Lakes are redevelopment parcels. This means they already have or have had <br />33 existing land uses that contributed traffic to the roadway network. To capture this existing network <br />34, traffic as a part of the proposed ordinance update for the Twin Lakes area, each parcel is assigned a <br />Page I of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.