My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011_0926_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2011
>
2011_0926_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2012 1:34:39 PM
Creation date
12/20/2011 2:11:12 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
163
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
base line for network trips. This is established using the existing trips generated by the last land use for <br />36 the parcels. <br />37 We have asked SRF Consulting to develop a revised Figure 21 that shows how the inclusion of this <br />3, 2030 background traffic and base line traffic would alter the cost allocation amounts. <br />39 The City Attorney has drafted an ordinance that will create a Twin Lakes Zoning Overlay District to <br />4 implement the mitigation measures identified in the Twin Lakes AUAR (which includes the <br />°11 construction of infrastructure). The proposed ordinance identifies the Twin Lakes Infrastructure <br />42 Improvement Report as the method of identifying a property owner's obligation for infrastructure <br />43 investment. The ordinance lays out development limitations for property within the Twin Lakes <br />44 Overlay District based on pre-existing network trips. The ordinance does not allow for development on <br />45 a parcel beyond the pre-existing network trips unless 1), the property owner enters into a voluntary <br />46 development agreement with the City that would include payment for the construction of the <br />47 infrastructure; 2), the property owner makes other arrangements satisfactory to the City for the <br />48 construction and payment of the infrastructure; or 3), the property owner waits until all infrastructure is <br />49 in place and paid for before redeveloping their parcel. <br />5o The Twin Lakes Overlay District also requires compliance with the other mitigation requirements <br />�'i identified in the Twin Lakes AUAR. Staff brought the proposed ordinance to the September 7th <br />52 Planning Commission Meeting. <br />53 POLICY OBJECTIVE <br />54 The intent of the Infrastructure Study was to allocate public improvement costs related to <br />55 redevelopment in the Twin Lakes area. This is the annual update of this study that incorporates the <br />56 actual Twin Lakes Infrastructure Phase 2 costs and distributes them consistent with the methodology in <br />�' ��7 the original report. <br />58 FINANCIAL IMPACTS <br />59 The "Infrastructure Improvements for the Twin Lakes AUAR Area- Final Report"' estimates each <br />6('_-) parcel's obligation for its share of costs for the public infrastructure construction to mitigate <br />6'i environmental impacts. In the long term, developers will contribute towards the cost of the <br />62 improvements when their property redevelops with contributions calculated using the cost allocation <br />63 formulas described in the report. <br />64 STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br />65 Approve the amendments to the Infrastructure IMprovements for the Twin Lakes AUAR Area- Final <br />66 Report. <br />67 REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION <br />64, Approved the amendments to the Infrastructure IMprovements for the Twin Lakes AU, R Area- Final <br />69 Report. <br />"7 ('_) <br />Prepared by: Debra Bloom., City Engineer <br />Attachments: A: Infrastructure Improvement Location Map <br />B: Twin Lakes ALTAR. Boundary Map <br />C: Figure 21 2010/ 2011 <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.